Mediation in crimes of embezzlement

The problem arises in what; the normative inputs of the Organic Comprehensive Criminal Code, does not allow conciliation to be applied in crimes of embezzlement, since, at the author's discretion, the inputs developed by the principles of restorative justice and minimal intervention can be taken into account, to argue about the necessity and proportionality, regarding the application of conciliation. The objective of this research is configured as: Determine the feasibility of conciliation in crimes of embezzlement based on restorative justice and minimal criminal intervention. The main questions associated with the research are: What are the main doctrinal foundations that restorative justice and minimal criminal intervention develop? What are the grounds of necessity and proportionality to channel conciliation in crimes of embezzlement? The research presented here is of a qualitative and documentary nature, methodologies through which they allowed us to obtain the main results and allow us to question the possibility of applying conciliation in crimes of embezzlement. The methodology used in this article is determined by means of a qualitative approach, prosecuted in the naturalistic scientific paradigm, of a descriptive, non-experimental nature.