Wound infection in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery: A meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Zhu, Wei [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Lingfeng [1 ,2 ]
Xie, Wenhua [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Gaoyue [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Yanqin [1 ,2 ]
Hou, Yansong [1 ,2 ]
He, Yi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Jiaxing Univ, Hosp Jiaxing 1, Dept Urol, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaxing Univ, Affiliated Hosp, Jiaxing, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
infected lymphocele; prostate cancer; retropubic radical prostate surgery; robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy; surgical site wound infection; PERIOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; CANCER; COMPLICATION; RATES; READMISSION;
D O I
10.1111/iwj.14228
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
A meta-analysis investigation was executed to measure the wound infection (WI) in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RRP) compared with retropubic radical prostate surgery (RRPS). A comprehensive literature investigation till February 2023 was applied, and 1197 interrelated investigations were reviewed. The 19 chosen investigations enclosed 107 153 individuals with prostate cancer (PC) at the starting point. 72 008 of them were utilising RRP, and 35 145 were utilising RRPS. Odds ratio (OR) in addition to 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was utilised to compute the value of the WI in RRP compared with RRPS by the dichotomous approaches and a fixed or random model. RRP had significantly lower surgical site wound infection (SSWI) (OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.21-0.52, P < .001) and infected lymphoceles (ILs) (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.92, P = .03) compared with RRPS in individuals with PC. RRP had significantly lower SSWI and ILs compared with RRPS in individuals with PC. However, care must be exercised when dealing with its values because of the low sample size of some of the nominated investigations for the meta-analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:3550 / 3557
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Retzius sparing robotic assisted radical prostatectomy vs. conventional robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chandan Phukan
    Andrew Mclean
    Arjun Nambiar
    Ankur Mukherjee
    Bhaskar Somani
    Rajbabu Krishnamoorthy
    Ashwin Sridhar
    Prabhakar Rajan
    Prasanna Sooriakumaran
    Bhavan Prasad Rai
    World Journal of Urology, 2020, 38 : 1123 - 1134
  • [32] Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gu, Li
    Li, Yijian
    Li, Xurui
    Liu, Wentao
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (04) : 1299 - 1307
  • [33] Does previous transurethral resection of the prostate negatively influence subsequent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in men diagnosed with prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li Gu
    Yijian Li
    Xurui Li
    Wentao Liu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2023, 17 : 1299 - 1307
  • [34] Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy after more than 5 years
    Billia, Michele
    Elhage, Oussama
    Challacombe, Benjamin
    Cahill, Declan
    Popert, Rick
    Holmes, Kathy
    Kirby, Roger Sinclair
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 32 (02) : 413 - 418
  • [35] Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: an Australian single-surgeon series
    Papachristos, Alexander
    Basto, Marnique
    te Marvelde, Luc
    Moon, Daniel
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 85 (03) : 154 - 158
  • [36] Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience
    Renato Almeida Rosa de Oliveira
    Gustavo Cardoso Guimarães
    Thiago Camelo Mourão
    Ricardo de Lima Favaretto
    Thiago Borges Marques Santana
    Ademar Lopes
    Stenio de Cassio Zequi
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 859 - 868
  • [37] Cost-effectiveness analysis of robotic-assisted versus retropubic radical prostatectomy: a single cancer center experience
    de Oliveira, Renato Almeida Rosa
    Guimaraes, Gustavo Cardoso
    Mourao, Thiago Camelo
    de Lima Favaretto, Ricardo
    Santana, Thiago Borges Marques
    Lopes, Ademar
    de Cassio Zequi, Stenio
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (06) : 859 - 868
  • [38] Technical advancements in robotic prostatectomy: single-port extraperitoneal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy and single-port transperineal robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Aminsharifi, Alireza
    Sawczyn, Guilherme
    Wilson, Clark A.
    Garisto, Juan
    Kaouk, Jihad
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (02) : 848 - 855
  • [39] Recommendations on robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: a Brazilian experts’ consensus
    Eliney Ferreira Faria
    Carlos Vaz Melo Maciel
    André Berger
    Anuar Mitre
    Breno Dauster
    Celso Heitor Freitas
    Clovis Fraga
    Daher Chade
    Marcos Dall’Oglio
    Francisco Carvalho
    Franz Campos
    Gustavo Franco Carvalhal
    Gustavo Caserta Lemos
    Gustavo Guimarães
    Hamilton Zampolli
    Joao Ricardo Alves
    Joao Pádua Manzano
    Marco Antônio Fortes
    Marcos Flavio Holanda Rocha
    Mauricio Rubinstein
    Murilo Luz
    Pedro Romanelli
    Rafael Coelho
    Raphael Rocha
    Roberto Dias Machado
    Rodolfo Borges dos Reis
    Stenio Zequi
    Romulo Guida
    Valdair Muglia
    Marcos Tobias-Machado
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2021, 15 : 829 - 839
  • [40] A Comparison of the Peri-Operative Data after Open Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy or Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy
    Uvin, P.
    de Meyer, J. -M.
    Van Holderbeke, G.
    ACTA CHIRURGICA BELGICA, 2010, 110 (03) : 313 - 316