Investigating biodiversity trends in different mitigation scenarios with a national integrated assessment model

被引:2
|
作者
Fiorini, Ana Carolina Oliveira [1 ,2 ]
Rochedo, Pedro Rua Rodriguez [1 ]
Angelkorte, Gerd [1 ]
Diuana, Fabio A. [1 ]
Imperio, Mariana [1 ]
Carvalho, Lucas Silva [1 ]
Morais, Taisa Nogueira [1 ]
Vasquez-Arroyo, Eveline [1 ]
Schaeffer, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, Ctr Energy & Environm Econ Cenergia, Energy Planning Programme PPE, COPPE, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, Ctr Energy & Environm Econ Cenergia, Ctr Tecnol, Energy Planning Programme PPE,COPPE, Ave Horacio Macedo 2030,C-211, BR-21941598 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Integrated assessment models; biodiversity; climate mitigation; land-use; land-cover; SDG; CLIMATE-CHANGE MITIGATION; LAND-USE; CONSERVATION; BRAZIL; DEFORESTATION; ADAPTATION; INDICATORS; IMPACTS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1080/1943815X.2023.2239323
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The inclusion of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in climate mitigation pathways is critical and can be reached by assessing their consequences through the deployment of appropriate indicators to that end. Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) are important tools for understanding possible impacts caused by adopting new policies. We investigate terrestrial biodiversity trends (life on land: SDG 15) for three different climate mitigation scenarios for Brazil: (1) A scenario compatible with a world that maintains its current policies with current deforestation rates in the Amazon and the Cerrado biomes; (2) A scenario in which Brazil fulfils its Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC); and (3) A scenario compatible with a world that limits warming to 1.5 & DEG;C. We use the Brazilian Land-Use and Energy System model (BLUES), a national IAM, to show the implications of the transitions involved in the above-mentioned scenarios for the country up to 2050. We conduct a post-processing analysis using consolidated biodiversity indicators to emphasize how different IAM greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions mitigation solutions present distinct positive and negative potential impacts on biodiversity in Brazil. However, our analysis does not consider the impacts associated with climate change, but only the risks imposed by mitigation policies. Our results indicate that biodiversity loss decreases in the scenarios from (1) to (3), implying that stronger climate change mitigation actions could result in smaller biodiversity losses. We conclude that Brazil has the opportunity to align its biodiversity and climate goals through nature-based solutions (NBS), such as forest conservation, restoration, pasture recovery, and the use of crop-pasture and agroforestry systems.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [21] An integrated framework for habitat restoration in fire-prone areas. Part 2-fire hazard assessment of the different land management scenarios
    Vaz, R.
    Maia, P.
    Keizer, J.
    Fernandes, P.
    Pereira, S. C.
    Carvalho, D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WILDLAND FIRE, 2024, 33 (11)
  • [22] Assessment of Pluvial Flood Mitigation Ecosystem Service in a Riverside City Using the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs Model for Ecological Corridor Mapping
    Castillo-Acosta, Yajaira
    Cardenas-Pillco, Berly
    Chanove-Manrique, Andrea
    WATER, 2025, 17 (02)
  • [23] Integrated Hydrological Model-Based Assessment of Stormwater Management Scenarios in Copenhagen's First Climate Resilient Neighbourhood Using the Three Point Approach
    Lerer, Sara Maria
    Righetti, Francesco
    Rozario, Thomas
    Mikkelsen, Peter Steen
    WATER, 2017, 9 (11)