Ground motion duration predictive models applicable for the Himalayan region

被引:1
作者
Anbazhagan, P. [1 ]
Motwani, Kunal [2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Sci, Dept Civil Engn, Bangalore 560012, India
[2] Natl Inst Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Mangalore 575025, Karnataka, India
关键词
Duration; predictive equation; Himalayan region; log-likelihood method; EQUATIONS; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12040-023-02120-2
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Several empirical models for the prediction of ground motion duration were developed across the world, but no model has been generated for the Himalayan region in the past. In this study, an attempt is made to study the duration models developed for different regions and compare them with a reference model developed for the Himalayan region for a wide range of magnitudes. The comparison is performed using the log-likelihood method and aims to identify the best duration prediction models based on the developed by Bajaj and Anbazhagan (2019) for the study region. The data support index values along with the weights of the corresponding models across the different distances and magnitude ranges have also been estimated. The study found that the predictive duration relation given by Lee and Green (2014) for Western North America is suitable for M & LE; 5, while the model developed by Ghanat (2011) is suitable for M > 5 for the Himalayan region. The model developed by Afshari and Stewart (2016) is also very close to the reference model. It is always preferable to have a single duration predictive model for a wide range of magnitude and distance range; hence, there is a need to develop a region-specific duration predictive model for the Himalayan region.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of ground motion duration on earthquake-induced structural collapse
    Raghunandan, Meera
    Liel, Abbie B.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL SAFETY, 2013, 41 : 119 - 133
  • [32] Correlations between duration and number of effective cycles of earthquake ground motion
    Bommer, JJ
    Hancock, J
    Alarcón, JE
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2006, 26 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [33] Ground-motion predictions in Shillong region, northeast India
    Nath, Sankar Kumar
    Thingbaijam, Kiran Kumar Singh
    Maiti, Soumya Kanti
    Nayak, Avinash
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SEISMOLOGY, 2012, 16 (03) : 475 - 488
  • [34] Seismology-based hybrid ground motion prediction models of PGA in Sichuan, China
    Jiang, Wei
    Tao, Xiaxin
    Tao, Zhengru
    [J]. SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2022, 156
  • [35] Cumulative absolute velocity, Arias intensity and significant duration predictive models from a pan-European strong-motion dataset
    Sandikkaya, M. Abdullah
    Akkar, Sinan
    [J]. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2017, 15 (05) : 1881 - 1898
  • [36] Significant duration predictive models developed from strong-motion data of thrust-faulting earthquakes recorded in Mexico City
    Lopez-Castaneda, Alheli S.
    Reinoso, Eduardo
    [J]. EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 2022, 51 (01) : 129 - 152
  • [37] Horizontal and Vertical Ground-Motion Duration Prediction Models from Interplate and Intermediate-Depth Intraslab Earthquakes in Mexico City
    Jaimes, Miguel A.
    Garcia-Soto, Adrian D.
    Candia, Gabriel
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2024, 114 (03) : 1695 - 1716
  • [38] A Machine Learning Approach to Developing Ground Motion Models From Simulated Ground Motions
    Withers, Kyle B.
    Moschetti, Morgan P.
    Thompson, Eric M.
    [J]. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (06)
  • [39] Learning aggregations of ground-motion models using data
    Riggelsen, Carsten
    Gianniotis, Nikos
    Scherbaum, Frank
    [J]. APPLICATIONS OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2011, : 721 - 728
  • [40] Testing Nonlinear Amplification Factors of Ground-Motion Models
    Loviknes, Karina
    Kotha, Sreeram Reddy
    Cotton, Fabrice
    Schorlemmer, Danijel
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2021, 111 (04) : 2121 - 2137