Experts' perspectives on how to promote implicit and explicit motor learning in children: A mixed-methods study

被引:1
|
作者
van der Veer, Ingrid P. A. [1 ,5 ]
Bastiaenen, Caroline H. G. [2 ]
Rameckers, Eugene A. A. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Klingels, Katrijn [1 ]
机构
[1] Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr REVAL, Hasselt, Belgium
[2] Maastricht Univ, Res Sch CAPHRI, Dept Epidemiol Functioning Participat & Rehabilita, Maastricht, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ, Res Sch CAPHRI, Dept Rehabil Med Functioning Participat & Rehabili, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Adelante Rehabil Ctr, Ctr Expertise, Valkenburg, Netherlands
[5] Hasselt Univ, Fac Rehabil Sci, Rehabil Res Ctr REVAL, Martelarenlaan 42, B-3500 Hasselt, Belgium
关键词
children; clinical decision making; explicit motor learning; feedback; implicit motor learning; instructions; mixed-methods study; DEVELOPMENTAL COORDINATION DISORDER; ATTENTION; FOCUS; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; THERAPY; SKILL;
D O I
10.1111/cch.13147
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
BackgroundLittle is known about how motor learning strategies (MLSs) can promote implicit and explicit motor learning processes. This study aimed to explore experts' perspectives on therapists' use of MLSs to promote specific learning processes in children with and without developmental coordination disorder (DCD). MethodsIn this mixed-methods study, two consecutive digital questionnaires were used to ascertain the opinions of international experts. Questionnaire 2 explored the findings of Questionnaire 1 in greater depth. In order to reach a certain level of agreement about the classification of MLSs as promoting either (more) implicit or (more) explicit motor learning, 5-point Likert scales were used in addition to open-ended questions. The open-ended questions were analysed with a conventional analysis approach. Open coding was performed by two reviewers independently. Categories and themes were discussed within the research team, taking both questionnaires as one dataset. ResultsTwenty-nine experts from nine different countries with different backgrounds in research, education and/or clinical care completed the questionnaires. The results of the Likert scales showed large variation. Two themes emerged from the qualitative analyses: (1) Experts found it difficult to classify MLSs as promoting either implicit or explicit motor learning, and (2) experts stressed the need for clinical decisionmaking when choosing MLSs. ConclusionsInsufficient insight was gained into how MLSs could promote (more) implicit or (more) explicit motor learning in children in general and in children with DCD specifically. But this study demonstrated the importance of clinical decisionmaking to model and adapt MLSs to child, task and environment, with therapists' knowledge of MLSs being an important prerequisite. Research is needed to better understand the various learning mechanisms of children and how MLSs can be used to manipulate these mechanisms.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Service Learning in the Nursing Bachelor Thesis: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Roca, Judith
    Gros Naves, Silvia
    Canet-Velez, Olga
    Torralbas-Ortega, Jordi
    Tort-Nasarre, Gloria
    Postic, Tijana
    Martinez, Laura
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [12] How do students evaluate their teachers' support for productive struggle in learning mathematics? A mixed-methods study
    Khalil, Ibrahim
    AL-Otaibi, Ahmed
    Almughyirah, Sultan
    Almalky, Mufareh
    COGENT EDUCATION, 2025, 12 (01):
  • [13] Using mobile devices for learning in clinical settings: A mixed-methods study of medical student, physician and patient perspectives
    Scott, Karen M.
    Nerminathan, Arany
    Alexander, Shirley
    Phelps, Megan
    Harrison, Amanda
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 48 (01) : 176 - 190
  • [14] Effect of Implicit Learning Methods With the External Focus of Attention on Bowling Skills in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Randomized Control Trial Study
    Khodayari, Mina
    Yaali, Rasoul
    Ghadiri, Farhad
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [15] Parents' and healthcare professionals' perspectives on manual therapy in infants: A mixed-methods study
    Driehuis, Femke
    Bakker-Jacobs, Annick
    Staal, J. Bart
    de Bie, Rob A.
    Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Maria W. G.
    Hoogeboom, Thomas J.
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (04):
  • [16] Perceptions of Black Children's Narrative Language: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Mills, Monique T.
    Moore, Leslie C.
    Chang, Rong
    Kim, Somin
    Frick, Bethany
    LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2021, 52 (01) : 84 - 99
  • [17] Effectiveness and Utility of Flowcharts on Learning in a Classroom Setting: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Zimmermann, Anthony E.
    King, Ethan E.
    Bose, Diptiman D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 88 (01)
  • [18] Perspectives of parents and nurses on the content validity of the Family Empowerment Scale for parents of children with a chronic condition: A mixed-methods study
    Segers, Elisabeth W.
    van den Hoogen, Agnes
    van Eerden, Irene C.
    Hafsteinsdottir, Thora
    Ketelaar, Marjolijn
    CHILD CARE HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 45 (01) : 111 - 120
  • [19] Lung Cancer Screening in People With HIV: A Mixed-Methods Study of Patient and Provider Perspectives
    Triplette, Matthew
    Brown, Meagan C.
    Snidarich, Madison
    Budak, Jehan Z.
    Giustini, Nicholas
    Murphy, Nicholas
    Romine, Perrin E.
    Weiner, Bryan J.
    Crothers, Kristina
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2023, 65 (04) : 608 - 617
  • [20] Learning how to swim in 5-to 12-year-old children: a scoping review of evidence-based motor learning methods
    Minkels, Carola
    van der Kamp, John
    de Vries, Ralph
    Beek, Peter J.
    FRONTIERS IN SPORTS AND ACTIVE LIVING, 2025, 7