Performance evaluation of multiple regional climate models to simulate rainfall in the Central Rift Valley Lakes Basin of Ethiopia and their selection criteria for the best climate model

被引:4
|
作者
Balcha, Sisay Kebede [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hulluka, Taye Alemayehu [1 ,3 ]
Awass, Adane Abebe [4 ]
Bantider, Amare [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Addis Ababa Univ, Ethiopian Inst Water Resources, Addis Ababa 1176, Ethiopia
[2] Arsi Univ, Coll Agr & Environm Sci, POB 193, Asella, Ethiopia
[3] Addis Ababa Univ, Water & Land Recourse Ctr, POB 1176, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
[4] Arba Minch Univ, Inst Water Technol, POB 21, Arba Minch, Ethiopia
基金
英国科研创新办公室;
关键词
Seasonality; RCM uncertainty; Multicriteria decision method; Best climate model; CORDEX-Africa; Central Rift Valley Lakes subbasin; PRECIPITATION; CMIP5; TEMPERATURE; HOMOGENEITY; INTERPOLATION; PROJECTIONS; CATCHMENT; DATASETS; RANKING;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-023-11437-w
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The historical datasets of five regional climate models (RCMs) available in the Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX)-Africa database are evaluated against ground-based observed rainfall in the Central Rift Valley Lakes Basin of Ethiopia. The evaluation is aimed at determining how well the RCMs reproduce monthly, seasonal, and annual cycles of rainfall and quantify the uncertainty between the RCMs in downscaling the same global climate model outputs. Root mean square, bias, and correlation coefficient are used to evaluate the ability of the RCM output. The multicriteria decision method of compromise programming was used to choose the best climate models for the climate condition of the Central Rift Valley Lakes subbasin. The Rossby Center Regional Atmospheric Model (RCA4) has downscaled ten global climate models (GCMs) and reproduces the monthly rainfall with a complex spatial distribution of bias and root mean square errors. The monthly bias varies in the range of - 35.8 to 189%. The summer (wet), spring, winter (dry), and annual rainfall varied within the range of 1.44 to 23.66%, - 7.08 to 20.04%, - 7.35 to 57%, and - 3.11 to 16.5%, respectively. To find the source of uncertainty, the same GCMs but downscaled by different RCMs were analyzed. The test results showed that each RCM differently downscaled the same GCM, and there was no single RCM model that consistently simulated the climate conditions over the stations in the study regions. However, the evaluation finds reasonable model skill in representing the temporal cycles of rainfall and suggests the use of RCMs where climate data is scarce after bias correction.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [31] Performance evaluation of land surface models and cumulus convection schemes in the simulation of Indian summer monsoon using a regional climate model
    Maity, S.
    Satyanarayana, A. N. V.
    Mandal, M.
    Nayak, S.
    ATMOSPHERIC RESEARCH, 2017, 197 : 21 - 41