Artificial intelligence assists surgeons' decision-making of temporary ileostomy in patients with rectal cancer who have received anterior resection

被引:11
作者
Shao, Shengli [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yufeng [3 ]
Lu, Qiyi [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Lu [1 ,2 ]
Mu, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Qin, Jichao [1 ,2 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Dept Surg, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[2] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Tongji Med Coll, Mol Med Ctr, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[3] Lanzhou Univ, Hosp 1, Dept Vasc Surg, Lanzhou 730030, Peoples R China
[4] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Surg, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[5] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Hosp, Mol Med Ctr, 1095 Jiefang Ave, Wuhan, Peoples R China
来源
EJSO | 2023年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
Arti ficial intelligence; Temporary ileostomy; Rectal cancer; Anastomotic leakage; ANASTOMOTIC LEAKAGE; MESORECTAL EXCISION; DIVERTING ILEOSTOMY; DEFUNCTIONING STOMA; RISK-FACTORS; METAANALYSIS; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2022.09.020
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Due to the difficult evaluation of the risk of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer resection, the decision to perform a temporary ileostomy is not easily distinguishable. The aim of the present study was to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for identifying the risk of AL to assist surgeons in the selective implementation of a temporary ileostomy. Materials and methods: The data from 2240 patients with rectal cancer who received anterior resection were collected, and these patients were divided into one training and two test cohorts. Five AI algorithms, such as support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), Naive Bayes (NB), stochastic gradient descent (SGD) and random forest (RF) were employed to develop predictive models using clinical variables and were assessed using the two test cohorts. Results: The SVM model indicated good discernment of AL, and might have increased the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients with AL in the training cohort (p < 0.001). Following the assessment of the two test cohorts, the SVM model could identify AL in a favorable manner, which performed with positive predictive values of 0.150 (0.091-0.234) and 0.151 (0.091-0.237), and negative predictive values of 0.977 (0.958-0.988) and 0.986 (0.969-0.994), respectively. It is important to note that the implementation of temporary ileostomy in patients without AL would have been significantly reduced (p < 0.001) and which would have been significantly increased in patients with AL (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The model (https:// alrisk.21cloudbox.com/) indicated good discernment of AL, which may be used to assist the surgeon's decision-making of performing temporary ileostomy. (c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd, BASO - The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology.All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 439
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [11] Hu X., 2015, MEDICINE, V94, P1847
  • [12] Hüser N, 2008, ANN SURG, V248, P52, DOI [10.1097/SLA.0b013e318176bf65, 10.1097/SLA.0b013e18176bf65]
  • [13] Artificial intelligence may help in predicting the need for additional surgery after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal cancer (vol 50, pg 230, 2017)
    Ichimasa, Katsuro
    Kudo, Shin-ei
    Mori, Yuichi
    Misawa, Masashi
    Matsudaira, Shingo
    Kouyama, Yuta
    Baba, Toshiyuki
    Hidaka, Eiji
    Wakamura, Kunihiko
    Hayashi, Takemasa
    Kudo, Toyoki
    Ishigaki, Tomoyuki
    Yagawa, Yusuke
    Nakamura, Hiroki
    Takeda, Kenichi
    Haji, Amyn
    Hamatani, Shigeharu
    Mori, Kensaku
    Ishida, Fumio
    Miyachi, Hideyuki
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2018, 50 (03) : C2 - C2
  • [14] Diverting ileostomy in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: high price of protection
    Ihnat, Peter
    Gunkova, Petra
    Peteja, Matus
    Vavra, Petr
    Pelikan, Anton
    Zonca, Pavel
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (11): : 4809 - 4816
  • [15] Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leakage After Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
    Kang, Celeste Y.
    Halabi, Wissam J.
    Chaudhry, Obaid O.
    Vinh Nguyen
    Pigazzi, Alessio
    Carmichael, Joseph C.
    Mills, Steven
    Stamos, Michael J.
    [J]. JAMA SURGERY, 2013, 148 (01) : 65 - 71
  • [16] Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer Is Different Between Minimally Invasive Surgery and Open Surgery
    Kim, Chang Woo
    Baek, Se Jin
    Hur, Hyuk
    Min, Byung Soh
    Baik, Seung Hyuk
    Kim, Nam Kyu
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (01) : 130 - 137
  • [17] A Nomogram to Predict Anastomotic Leakage in Open Rectal Surgery-Hope or Hype?
    Klose, Johannes
    Tarantino, Ignazio
    von Fournier, Armin
    Stowitzki, Moritz J.
    Kulu, Yakup
    Bruckner, Thomas
    Volz, Claudia
    Schmidt, Thomas
    Schneider, Martin
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Ulrich, Alexis
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2018, 22 (09) : 1619 - 1630
  • [18] The Artificial Intelligence Clinician learns optimal treatment strategies for sepsis in intensive care
    Komorowski, Matthieu
    Celi, Leoa
    Badawi, Omar
    Gordon, Anthony C.
    Faisal, A. Aldo
    [J]. NATURE MEDICINE, 2018, 24 (11) : 1716 - +
  • [19] Artificial Intelligence System to Determine Risk of T1 Colorectal Cancer Metastasis to Lymph Node
    Kudo, Shin-ei
    Ichimasa, Katsuro
    Villard, Benjamin
    Mori, Yuichi
    Misawa, Masashi
    Saito, Shoichi
    Hotta, Kinichi
    Saito, Yutaka
    Matsuda, Takahisa
    Yamada, Kazutaka
    Mitani, Toshifumi
    Ohtsuka, Kazuo
    Chino, Akiko
    Ide, Daisuke
    Imai, Kenichiro
    Kishida, Yoshihiro
    Nakamura, Keiko
    Saiki, Yasumitsu
    Tanaka, Masafumi
    Hoteya, Shu
    Yamashita, Satoshi
    Kinugasa, Yusuke
    Fukuda, Masayoshi
    Kudo, Toyoki
    Miyachi, Hideyuki
    Ishida, Fumio
    Itoh, Hayato
    Oda, Masahiro
    Mori, Kensaku
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 160 (04) : 1075 - +
  • [20] Anterior resection for rectal cancer with mesorectal excision - A prospective evaluation of 622 patients
    Law, WL
    Chu, KW
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 260 - 268