Better job prospects or an imperative to 'just work'? A cross-national study on social investment and women's employment

被引:0
|
作者
Hong, Ijin [1 ]
Kang, Ji Young [2 ]
Lee, Jieun [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Ctr Chinese Publ Adm Res, Sch Govt, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Chungnam Natl Univ, Dept Social Welf, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
active labour market policies; childcare; female employment; full-time employment; high-skilled employment; social investment; LABOR-MARKET POLICY; FAMILY POLICY; POLITICAL-ECONOMY; OECD COUNTRIES; GENDER; PERSPECTIVE; QUALITY; WELFARE; PARTICIPATION; OPPORTUNITIES;
D O I
10.1111/ijsw.12592
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Social investment policies advocate for more and better jobs by supporting families' work-life balance and investing in human capital. But do they really help to boost employment prospects for women? Earlier literature suggests a positive relationship, but not enough attention has been paid to the type of employment, or to who the actual beneficiaries of these measures are. This article combines ISSP survey data with OECD and national data in a multilevel analysis to determine whether social investment policies benefit female employment, improve job prospects, and apply to all women irrespective of their educational level. We find that training and childcare policies are associated with higher employment levels, however, the claim that social investment increases chances for better job prospects finds little empirical support. These findings suggest that active labour market and childcare policies are associated with more women's employment, but they might still be following a push to 'just work'.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 421
页数:39
相关论文
共 45 条