Long-term prediction of functional independence using adjusted and unadjusted single items of the functional independence measure (FIM) at discharge from rehabilitation

被引:5
作者
Garcia-Rudolph, Alejandro [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Wright, Mark [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Garcia, Loreto [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sauri, Joan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Cegarra, Blanca [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tormos, Josep Maria [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Opisso, Eloy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Inst Univ Neurorehabil Adscrit UAB, Inst Guttmann, Dept Res & Innovat, Barcelona, Spain
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Bellaterra, Cerdanyola Del, Spain
[3] Fundacio Inst Invest Ciencies Salut Germans Trias, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Hosp Neurorehabil, Inst Guttmann, Dept Res & Innovat, Cami Can Ruti S-N, Barcelona 08916, Spain
关键词
Activities of daily living; Functional independence; Prognostic models; Prediction; Long-term; SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; LENGTH-OF-STAY; INPATIENT REHABILITATION; PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS; OUTCOMES; INTERVENTIONS; INDIVIDUALS; CAREGIVERS; RECOVERY; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.1080/10790268.2023.2183326
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
ContextBeing able to survive in the long-term independently is of concern to patients with spinal cord injury (SCI), their relatives, and to those providing or planning health care, especially at rehabilitation discharge. Most previous studies have attempted to predict functional dependency in activities of daily living within one year after injury.Objectives(1) build 18 different predictive models, each model using one FIM (Functional Independence Measure) item, assessed at discharge, as independent predictor of total FIM score at chronic phase (3-6 years post-injury) (2) build three different predictive models, using in each model an item from a different FIM domain with the highest predictive power obtained in objective (1) to predict "good" functional independence at chronic phase and (3) adjust the 3 models from objective (2) with known confounding factors.MethodsThis observational study included 461 patients admitted to rehabilitation between 2009 and 2019. We applied regression models to predict total FIM score and "good" functional independence (FIM motor score >= 65) reporting adjusted R-2, odds ratios, ROC-AUC (95% CI) tested using 10-fold cross-validation.ResultsThe top three predictors, each from a different FIM domain, were Toilet (adjusted R-2 = 0.53, Transfers domain), Toileting (adjusted R-2 = 0.46, Self-care domain), and Bowel (adjusted R-2 = 0.35, Sphincter control domain). These three items were also predictors of "good" functional independence (AUC: 0.84-0.87) and their predictive power increased (AUC: 0.88-0.93) when adjusted by age, paraplegia, time since injury, and length of stay.ConclusionsDischarge FIM items accurately predict long-term functional independence.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 660
页数:12
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   Predictors of functional outcome in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury after inpatient rehabilitation: In Saudi Arabia [J].
Abdul-Sattar, Amal B. .
NEUROREHABILITATION, 2014, 35 (02) :341-347
[2]   Predictors of functional outcomes in adults with traumatic spinal cord injury following inpatient rehabilitation: A systematic review [J].
AlHuthaifi, Faisal ;
Krzak, Joseph ;
Hanke, Timothy ;
Vogel, Lawrence C. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2017, 40 (03) :282-294
[3]   Functional recovery measures for spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review for clinical practice and research - Functional recovery outcome measures work group [J].
Anderson, Kim ;
Aito, Sergio ;
Atkins, Michal ;
Biering-Sorensen, Fin ;
Charlifue, Susan ;
Curt, Armin ;
Ditunno, John ;
Glass, Clive ;
Marino, Ralph ;
Marshall, Ruth ;
Mulcahey, Mary Jane ;
Post, Marcel ;
Savic, Gordana ;
Scivoletto, Giorgio ;
Catz, Amiram .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2008, 31 (02) :133-144
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2022, About us
[5]   Using Dominance Analysis to Determine Predictor Importance in Logistic Regression [J].
Azen, Razia ;
Traxel, Nicole .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL AND BEHAVIORAL STATISTICS, 2009, 34 (03) :319-347
[6]   The experience of using the scale of Functional Independence Measure in individuals undergoing spinal cord injury rehabilitation in Brazil [J].
Barbetta, D. C. ;
Cassemiro, L. C. ;
Assis, M. R. .
SPINAL CORD, 2014, 52 (04) :276-281
[7]   The effect of the introduction of a case-mix-based funding model of rehabilitation for severe stroke: An Australian experience [J].
Brock, Kim A. ;
Vale, Stephen J. ;
Cotton, Susan M. .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2007, 88 (07) :827-832
[8]   Relationship of therapeutic recreation inpatient rehabilitation interventions and patient characteristics to outcomes following spinal cord injury: The SCIRehab project [J].
Cahow, Claire ;
Gassaway, Julie ;
Rider, Cecilia ;
Joyce, Joan P. ;
Bogenshutz, Andrew ;
Edens, Kelly ;
Kreider, Scott E. D. ;
Whiteneck, Gale .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2012, 35 (06) :547-564
[9]   A multicenter international study on the Spinal Cord Independence Measure, version III:: Rasch psychometric validation [J].
Catz, A. ;
Itzkovich, M. ;
Tesio, L. ;
Biering-Sorensen, F. ;
Weeks, C. ;
Laramee, M. T. ;
Craven, B. C. ;
Tonack, M. ;
Hitzig, S. L. ;
Glaser, E. ;
Zeilig, G. ;
Aito, S. ;
Scivoletto, G. ;
Mecci, M. ;
Chadwick, R. J. ;
El Masry, W. S. ;
Osman, A. ;
Glass, C. A. ;
Silva, P. ;
Zeilig, G. ;
Aito, S. ;
Scivoletto, G. ;
Mecci, M. ;
Chadwick, R. J. ;
El Masry, W. S. ;
Osman, A. ;
Glass, C. A. ;
Silva, P. ;
Soni, B. M. ;
Gardner, B. P. ;
Savic, G. ;
Bergstrom, E. M. ;
Bluvshtein, V. ;
Ronen, J. .
SPINAL CORD, 2007, 45 (04) :275-291
[10]   Spinal cord injury in Italy: A multicenter retrospective study [J].
Celani, MG ;
Spizzichino, L ;
Ricci, S ;
Zampolini, M ;
Franceschini, M .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2001, 82 (05) :589-596