The short- and long-term outcomes in living-donor liver transplantation using small-for-size graft: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Kim, Ki-Hun [1 ,2 ]
Kim, Sang-Hoon [1 ]
Cho, Hwui-Dong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ulsan, Asan Med Ctr, Coll Med, Dept Surg,Div Liver Transplantat & Hepatobiliary S, Seoul, South Korea
[2] 88 Olymp Ro 43 Gil, Seoul 05505, South Korea
关键词
Graft -to -recipient weight ratio; Living -donor liver transplantation; Small -for -size graft; Small -for -size syndromes; meta; -analysis; RECIPIENT WEIGHT RATIO; PORTAL FLOW; MODULATION; INFLOW; IMPACT; VOLUME; PROGNOSIS; RISKS; VEIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.trre.2023.100747
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: A standard graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) >= 0.8% is widely accepted in living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT); however, the potential donor pool is expanded to patients adopting small-for-size graft (SFSGs) with GRWR <0.8%. This study aimed to investigate the effect of SFSG on short-and long-term outcomes following LDLT. Methods: Electronic databases were searched from January 1995 to January 2022 for studies comparing short-or long-term outcomes between patients with SFSG (GRWR <0.8%, SFSG group) and sufficient volume graft (GRWR >= 0.8%, non-SFSG group). The primary outcomes were one-, three-, and five-year overall survival (OS) and graft survival (GS), while the secondary outcome was postoperative complications. Results: Twenty-four studies comprising 7996 patients were included. In terms of OS, SFSG group had poor three-year OS (HR: 1.48, 95% CI [1.01, 2.15], p = 0.04), but there were no significant differences between two groups in one-year OS (HR: 1.50, 95% CI [0.98, 2.29], p = 0.06) and five-year OS (HR: 1.40, 95% CI [0.95, 2.08], p = 0.02). In GS, there were no significant differences in one-year (HR 1.31, 95% CI [1.00, 1.72], p = 0.05), three-year (HR 1.33, 95% CI [0.97, 1.82], p = 0.07), and five-year GS (HR 1.17, 95% CI [0.95, 1.44], p = 0.13). The SFSG group had comparable postoperative complications, except for a high incidence of vascular complications and small-for-size syndromes. Conclusions: Expanding the potential donor pool in LDLT to SFSG with GRWR <0.8% can be acceptable in terms of comparable long-term OS and GS, despite the risk for vascular complications and small-for-size syndrome.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Outcomes of adult patients adopting small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yan, Yue
    Zheng, Dao-Feng
    Pu, Jun-Liang
    Wu, Zhong-Jun
    HEPATOBILIARY & PANCREATIC DISEASES INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 18 (03) : 206 - 213
  • [2] Graft Inflow Modulation in Living Donor Liver Transplantation with a Small-for-Size Graft: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Gavriilidis, Paschalis
    Azoulay, Daniel
    CHIRURGIA, 2022, 117 (03) : 245 - 257
  • [3] Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis
    Ma, Ka Wing
    Wong, Kelly Hiu Ching
    Chan, Albert Chi Yan
    Cheung, Tan To
    Dai, Wing Chiu
    Fung, James Yan Yue
    She, Wong Hoi
    Lo, Chung Mau
    Chok, Kenneth Siu Ho
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 25 (36) : 5559 - 5568
  • [4] Outcomes of adult patients adopting small-for-size grafts in living donor liver transplantation: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yue Yan
    Dao-Feng Zheng
    Jun-Liang Pu
    Zhong-Jun Wu
    Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International, 2019, 18 (03) : 206 - 213
  • [5] Impact of small-for-size liver grafts on medium-term and long-term graft survival in living donor liver transplantation: A meta-analysis
    Ka Wing Ma
    Kelly Hiu Ching Wong
    Albert Chi Yan Chan
    Tan To Cheung
    Wing Chiu Dai
    James Yan Yue Fung
    Wong Hoi She
    Chung Mau Lo
    Kenneth Siu Ho Chok
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2019, 25 (36) : 5559 - 5568
  • [6] Small-for-size graft, small-for-size syndrome and inflow modulation in living donor liver transplantation
    Ikegami, Toru
    Onda, Shinji
    Furukawa, Kenei
    Haruki, Koichiro
    Shirai, Yoshihiro
    Gocho, Takeshi
    JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES, 2020, 27 (11) : 799 - 809
  • [7] Small-for-Size versus Standard-Size Graft in Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Dogar, Abdul Wahab
    Uddin, Shams
    Hussain, Azhar
    Ullah, Kaleem
    Ghaffar, Abdul
    Abbas, Syed Hasnain
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2022, 32 (03): : 293 - 297
  • [8] Liver Lobe Graft Side and Outcomes in Living-Donor Liver Transplant With Small-for-Size Grafts
    Julka, Karan D.
    Chen, Chao-Long
    Vasavada, Bhavin
    EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 12 (04) : 343 - 350
  • [9] Small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft
    Masahiko Taniguchi
    Tsuyoshi Shimamura
    Satoru Todo
    Hiroyuki Furukawa
    Surgery Today, 2015, 45 : 663 - 671
  • [10] Small-for-size syndrome in living-donor liver transplantation using a left lobe graft
    Taniguchi, Masahiko
    Shimamura, Tsuyoshi
    Todo, Satoru
    Furukawa, Hiroyuki
    SURGERY TODAY, 2015, 45 (06) : 663 - 671