共 1 条
Checkmate? Corporate Power-sharing, Liberal Voting Rights and the Kosovo Supreme Court
被引:2
|作者:
Bochsler, Daniel
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Cent European Univ CEU, Nationalism Studies & Polit Sci Dept, Vienna, Austria
[2] Univ Belgrade, Fac Polit Sci, Belgrade, Serbia
[3] Cent European Univ, Quellenstr 51, A-1100 Vienna, Austria
基金:
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词:
DIVIDED SOCIETIES;
PARTY BANS;
CITIZENSHIP;
REPRESENTATION;
PARTITION;
ELECTIONS;
BOSNIA;
D O I:
10.1080/17449057.2022.2093563
中图分类号:
C95 [民族学、文化人类学];
学科分类号:
0304 ;
030401 ;
摘要:
After the 2021 parliamentary elections, the Kosovo Supreme Court annulled some 5800 votes expressed for three minority lists running for guaranteed seats of the Bosniak and the Roma minorities. The court considered it impossible that they were cast by members of the respective ethnic communities. This court ruling has wider implications for consociational theory, as it makes novel normative prescriptions about group representation in divided societies. The debate in Kosovo closely mirrors similar controversies elsewhere, such as the 'Sejdie-Finci' case in the elections of the state presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, or the reserved parliamentary seats in Lebanon.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 605
页数:17
相关论文