Objective Measurement of Posture and Movement in Young Children Using Wearable Sensors and Customised Mathematical Approaches: A Systematic Review

被引:6
作者
Hendry, Danica [1 ,2 ]
Rohl, Andrew L. [2 ,3 ]
Rasmussen, Charlotte Lund [1 ,2 ]
Zabatiero, Juliana [1 ,2 ]
Cliff, Dylan P. [2 ,4 ]
Smith, Simon S. [2 ,5 ]
Mackenzie, Janelle [2 ,6 ]
Pattinson, Cassandra L. [2 ,5 ]
Straker, Leon [1 ,2 ]
Campbell, Amity [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Curtin Univ, Sch Allied Hlth, Perth, WA 6102, Australia
[2] ARC Ctr Excellence Digital Child, Brisbane, ACT 2609, Australia
[3] Curtin Univ, Sch Elect Engn Comp & Math Sci, Perth, WA 6845, Australia
[4] Univ Wollongong, Sch Educ, Early Start, Keiraville, NSW 2522, Australia
[5] Univ Queensland, Inst Social Sci Res, Brisbane, Qld 4006, Australia
[6] Queensland Univ Technol, Sch Comp Sci, Brisbane, Qld 4000, Australia
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
posture; movement; activity tracking; children; machine learning; review; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; RECOGNITION; ACCELEROMETER; COMPETENCE; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.3390/s23249661
中图分类号
O65 [分析化学];
学科分类号
070302 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Given the importance of young children's postures and movements to health and development, robust objective measures are required to provide high-quality evidence. This study aimed to systematically review the available evidence for objective measurement of young (0-5 years) children's posture and movement using machine learning and other algorithm methods on accelerometer data. From 1663 papers, a total of 20 papers reporting on 18 studies met the inclusion criteria. Papers were quality-assessed and data extracted and synthesised on sample, postures and movements identified, sensors used, model development, and accuracy. A common limitation of studies was a poor description of their sample data, yet over half scored adequate/good on their overall study design quality assessment. There was great diversity in all aspects examined, with evidence of increasing sophistication in approaches used over time. Model accuracy varied greatly, but for a range of postures and movements, models developed on a reasonable-sized (n > 25) sample were able to achieve an accuracy of >80%. Issues related to model development are discussed and implications for future research outlined. The current evidence suggests the rapidly developing field of machine learning has clear potential to enable the collection of high-quality evidence on the postures and movements of young children.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [1] Machine Learning Models for Classifying Physical Activity in Free-Living Preschool Children
    Ahmadi, Matthew N.
    Pavey, Toby G.
    Trost, Stewart G.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (16) : 1 - 14
  • [2] Machine Learning to Quantify Physical Activity in Children with Cerebral Palsy: Comparison of Group, Group-Personalized, and Fully-Personalized Activity Classification Models
    Ahmadi, Matthew N.
    O'Neil, Margaret E.
    Baque, Emmah
    Boyd, Roslyn N.
    Trost, Stewart G.
    [J]. SENSORS, 2020, 20 (14) : 1 - 17
  • [3] Free-living Evaluation of Laboratory-based Activity Classifiers in Preschoolers
    Ahmadi, Matthew N.
    Brookes, Denise
    Chowdhury, Alok
    Pavey, Toby
    Trost, Stewart G.
    [J]. MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2020, 52 (05) : 1227 - 1234
  • [4] Intelligent wearable allows out-of-the-lab tracking of developing motor abilities in infants
    Airaksinen, Manu
    Gallen, Anastasia
    Kivi, Anna
    Vijayakrishnan, Pavithra
    Hayrinen, Taru
    Ilen, Elina
    Rasanen, Okko
    Haataja, Leena M. M.
    Vanhatalo, Sampsa
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS MEDICINE, 2022, 2 (01):
  • [5] Automatic Posture and Movement Tracking of Infants with Wearable Movement Sensors
    Airaksinen, Manu
    Rasanen, Okko
    Ilen, Elina
    Hayrinen, Taru
    Kivi, Anna
    Marchi, Viviana
    Gallen, Anastasia
    Blom, Sonja
    Varhe, Anni
    Kaartinen, Nico
    Haataja, Leena
    Vanhatalo, Sampsa
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
  • [6] A systematic review of proxy-report questionnaires assessing physical activity, sedentary behavior and/or sleep in young children (aged 0-5 years)
    Arts, Jelle
    Gubbels, Jessica S.
    Verhoeff, Arnoud P.
    Chinapaw, Mai J. M.
    Lettink, Annelinde
    Altenburg, Teatske M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2022, 19 (01)
  • [7] Boughorbel S., 2010, P ACM INT C P SERIES
  • [8] Infants' and toddlers' physical activity and sedentary time as measured by accelerometry: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bruijns, Brianne A.
    Truelove, Stephanie
    Johnson, Andrew M.
    Gilliland, Jason
    Tucker, Patricia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL NUTRITION AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2020, 17 (01)
  • [9] A Tutorial on Human Activity Recognition Using Body-Worn Inertial Sensors
    Bulling, Andreas
    Blanke, Ulf
    Schiele, Bernt
    [J]. ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2014, 46 (03)
  • [10] Research Screener: a machine learning tool to semi-automate abstract screening for systematic reviews
    Chai, Kevin E. K.
    Lines, Robin L. J.
    Gucciardi, Daniel F.
    Ng, Leo
    [J]. SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2021, 10 (01)