Fixed cost allocation using asymmetrical core-Nash bargaining DEA game

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Qingyun [1 ]
Meng, Fanyong [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ Informat Sci & Technol, Sch Management Sci & Engn, Nanjing 210044, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Data envelopment analysis; fixed cost allocation; cooperative game; asymmetrical core-Nash bargaining game; SHARED COSTS; EFFICIENCY INVARIANCE; EQUITABLE ALLOCATION; CROSS-EFFICIENCY;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2023.2295388
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper introduces cooperative game theory into the data envelopment analysis (DEA) method for building a novel fixed cost allocation (FCA) approach from group and individual consciousness. We start by acknowledging the divergences of decision-making units (DMUs) and propose an asymmetrical Nash bargaining DEA game, where DMUs' bargaining powers are defined through the functions of cross-efficiency and operation scale. However, the asymmetrical Nash bargaining solution is proposed from an individual perspective, without providing the theoretical support of full cooperation. To narrow this gap, we further introduce the core concept of a coalitional cooperative game into the built asymmetrical Nash bargaining DEA game, resulting in the asymmetrical core-Nash bargaining DEA game. The asymmetrical core-Nash bargaining solution is based on the common weights, with the properties of stability, fairness, Pareto-efficiency, and invariance to affine transformation. Furthermore, our proposed approach inherently ensures the uniqueness of the fixed cost scheme. Finally, numerical analysis and case study are provided to show the concrete application of the new method.
引用
收藏
页码:2018 / 2031
页数:14
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Proposing a method for fixed cost allocation using DEA based on the efficiency invariance and common set of weights principles
    Gholam Reza Jahanshahloo
    Jafar Sadeghi
    Mohammad Khodabakhshi
    Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2017, 85 : 223 - 240
  • [22] Individual rationality and overall fairness in fixed cost allocation: An approach under DEA cross-efficiency evaluation mechanism
    Chu, Junfei
    Su, Wang
    Li, Feng
    Yuan, Zhe
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2023, 74 (03) : 992 - 1007
  • [23] Centralized fixed cost and resource allocation considering technology heterogeneity: a DEA approach
    Tao Ding
    Ya Chen
    Huaqing Wu
    Yuqi Wei
    Annals of Operations Research, 2018, 268 : 497 - 511
  • [24] Centralized fixed cost allocation for generalized two-stage network DEA
    Ding, Tao
    Zhu, Qingyuan
    Zhang, Baofeng
    Liang, Liang
    INFOR, 2019, 57 (02) : 123 - 140
  • [25] Fair Allocation Fixed Cost Using Cross-Efficiency Based on Pareto Concept
    Sharafi, Hamid
    Lotfi, Farhad Hosseinzadeh
    Jahanshahloo, Gholam Reza
    Razipour-GhalehJough, Somayeh
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2020, 37 (01)
  • [26] A hybrid genetic algorithm and DEA approach for multi-criteria fixed cost allocation
    Parag C. Pendharkar
    Soft Computing, 2018, 22 : 7315 - 7324
  • [27] Measuring environmental efficiency of the EU based on a DEA approach with fixed cost allocation under different decision goals
    Zhu, Yu
    Yang, Feng
    Wei, Fangqing
    Wang, Dawei
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2022, 208
  • [28] Fixed cost allocation in two-stage system using DEA from a noncooperative view
    Qingxian An
    Ping Wang
    Honglin Yang
    Zongrun Wang
    OR Spectrum, 2021, 43 : 1077 - 1102
  • [29] Fixed cost allocation for two-stage systems with cooperative relationship using data envelopment analysis
    An, Qingxian
    Wang, Ping
    Shi, Shasha
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 145 (145)
  • [30] Efficiency decomposition in a three-stage network structure: Cooperative DEA, Nash bargaining game models and conic relaxations
    Golsefid, Narges Torabi
    Salahi, Maziar
    RAIRO-OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2021, 55 (06) : 3677 - 3699