Expanded modelling scenarios to understand the role of offshore wind in decarbonizing the United States

被引:13
作者
Beiter, Philipp [1 ]
Mai, Trieu [1 ]
Mowers, Matthew
Bistline, John [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Elect Power Res Inst, Palo Alto, CA USA
关键词
Decision making - Electric power transmission - Energy policy - Offshore oil well production;
D O I
10.1038/s41560-023-01364-y
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
An assessment of decarbonization pathways in energy models reveals fundamental limitations in representing factors that are relevant for practical decision-making. Although these modelling limitations are widely acknowledged, their impact on the deployment of individual power generation types is not well understood. As a result, the societal value from such generation types could be vastly misrepresented. Here we explore a wide spectrum of factors that impact offshore wind deployment in the United States using a detailed capacity expansion model. Many factors prescribe a large future role for offshore wind, yet this diverges from what models often show. We extend the typically narrow modelling context through high spatial resolution, several cost and transmission possibilities and various energy-sector policies. We estimate offshore wind to constitute 1-8% (31-256 gigawatts) of total US generation by 2050. This wide range suggests an uncertain but potentially important regional role. Our expansive scenarios demonstrate how to address many limitations of decarbonization modelling. Offshore wind will play a key role in decarbonized power systems, but pathway modelling sometimes overlooks critical aspects of its deployment. Beiter et al. use a detailed capacity expansion model to explore different scenarios with high spatial resolution to understand the regional role for offshore wind in the USA.
引用
收藏
页码:1240 / 1249
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[41]  
Musial W., 2021, Offshore Wind Market Report: 2021 Edition Technical Report DOE/GO-102021-5614
[42]   The near-optimal feasible space of a renewable power system model [J].
Neumann, Fabian ;
Brown, Tom .
ELECTRIC POWER SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2021, 190
[43]  
ONeil R., 2020, PNNL-29935
[44]   Modeling all alternative solutions for highly renewable energy systems [J].
Pedersen, Tim T. ;
Victoria, Marta ;
Rasmussen, Morten G. ;
Andresen, Gorm B. .
ENERGY, 2021, 234
[45]   Energy systems modeling for twenty-first century energy challenges [J].
Pfenninger, Stefan ;
Hawkes, Adam ;
Keirstead, James .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 33 :74-86
[46]   Modelling net-zero emissions energy systems requires a change in approach [J].
Pye, S. ;
Broad, O. ;
Bataille, C. ;
Brockway, P. ;
Daly, H. E. ;
Freeman, R. ;
Gambhir, A. ;
Geden, O. ;
Rogan, F. ;
Sanghvi, S. ;
Tomei, J. ;
Vorushylo, I. ;
Watson, J. .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2021, 21 (02) :222-231
[47]   Cost optimal scenarios of a future highly renewable European electricity system: Exploring the influence of weather data, cost parameters and policy constraints [J].
Schlachtberger, D. P. ;
Brown, T. ;
Schaefer, M. ;
Schramm, S. ;
Greiner, M. .
ENERGY, 2018, 163 :100-114
[48]   The benefits of cooperation in a highly renewable European electricity network [J].
Schlachtberger, D. P. ;
Brown, T. ;
Schramm, S. ;
Greiner, M. .
ENERGY, 2017, 134 :469-481
[49]  
Shields M., 2023, Tech. Rep. NREL/TP-5000-84710
[50]   Current status and future trends of offshore wind power in Europe [J].
Soares-Ramos, Emanuel P. P. ;
de Oliveira-Assis, Lais ;
Sarrias-Mena, Raul ;
Fernandez-Ramirez, Luis M. .
ENERGY, 2020, 202