Effect of an Analogy-Based Approach of Artificial Intelligence Pedagogy in Upper Primary Schools

被引:13
作者
Dai, Yun [1 ,5 ]
Lin, Ziyan [1 ]
Liu, Ang [2 ]
Dai, Dan [3 ]
Wang, Wenlan [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Sydney, Australia
[3] Hunan Acad Social Sci, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] South China Normal Univ, Sch Educ Sci, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; pedagogy; instructional design; AI education; primary education; analogy; DECADE;
D O I
10.1177/07356331231201342
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a prominent topic in K-12 education recently. However, pedagogical design has remained a major challenge, especially among young learners. Guided by the Zone of Proximal Development theory and AI education research literature, this design-based study proposes an analogy-based pedagogical approach to support AI teaching and learning in upper primary education. This pedagogical approach is centered on human-AI comparison, where humans are gradually shifted from an analogue to a contrast to make visible the attributes, mechanisms, and processes of AI. To evaluate its effectiveness, a quasi-experimental study with mixed methods was conducted. The quantitative comparison shows that the participants in the experimental group learning with the analogy-based pedagogical approach significantly outperformed their peers with the conventional direct instructional approach in all three dimensions of AI knowledge, skills, and ethical awareness. Qualitative analyses further reveal its pedagogical benefits, including demystifying AI through relatable and engaging learning, supporting student comprehension and skill mastery, and nurturing critical thinking and attitudes. The analogy-based approach contributes to the field of K-12 AI education with an age-appropriate, child-friendly pedagogical approach. Notably, AI education should prioritize teaching for student understanding, and AI should be recognized as an independent subject with interdisciplinary applications.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 186
页数:28
相关论文
共 65 条
[51]   Can You Teach Me To Machine Learn? An Exploration of Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching Machine Learning to Non-Majors [J].
Sulmont, Elisabeth ;
Patitsas, Elizabeth ;
Cooperstock, Jeremy R. .
SIGCSE '19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 50TH ACM TECHNICAL SYMPOSIUM ON COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2019, :948-954
[52]  
The Design-Based Research Collective, 2003, Educational Researcher, V32, P5, DOI [10.3102/0013189X032001005, DOI 10.3102/0013189X032001005]
[53]  
Touretzky D, 2019, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P9795
[54]   Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change [J].
Treagust, DF ;
Harrison, AG ;
Venville, GJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1996, 18 (02) :213-229
[55]   The use of a computer simulation to promote conceptual change: A quasi-experimental study [J].
Trundle, Kathy Cabe ;
Bell, Randy L. .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2010, 54 (04) :1078-1088
[56]  
UNESCO, 2022, K-12 AI Curricula. A Mapping of government -endorsed AI curricula
[57]   Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research [J].
van de Pol, Janneke ;
Volman, Monique ;
Beishuizen, Jos .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2010, 22 (03) :271-296
[58]  
Vygotsky L. S., 1978, MIND SOC DEV HIGHER, DOI [10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4, DOI 10.2307/J.CTVJF9VZ4, https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4]
[59]  
Wiske M.S., 1998, TEACHING UNDERSTANDI
[60]  
Wong GKW., 2020, ACM Inroads, V11, P20, DOI DOI 10.1145/3381884