Effect of an Analogy-Based Approach of Artificial Intelligence Pedagogy in Upper Primary Schools

被引:13
作者
Dai, Yun [1 ,5 ]
Lin, Ziyan [1 ]
Liu, Ang [2 ]
Dai, Dan [3 ]
Wang, Wenlan [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Mech & Mfg Engn, Sydney, Australia
[3] Hunan Acad Social Sci, Changsha, Peoples R China
[4] South China Normal Univ, Sch Educ Sci, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Curriculum & Instruct, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; pedagogy; instructional design; AI education; primary education; analogy; DECADE;
D O I
10.1177/07356331231201342
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a prominent topic in K-12 education recently. However, pedagogical design has remained a major challenge, especially among young learners. Guided by the Zone of Proximal Development theory and AI education research literature, this design-based study proposes an analogy-based pedagogical approach to support AI teaching and learning in upper primary education. This pedagogical approach is centered on human-AI comparison, where humans are gradually shifted from an analogue to a contrast to make visible the attributes, mechanisms, and processes of AI. To evaluate its effectiveness, a quasi-experimental study with mixed methods was conducted. The quantitative comparison shows that the participants in the experimental group learning with the analogy-based pedagogical approach significantly outperformed their peers with the conventional direct instructional approach in all three dimensions of AI knowledge, skills, and ethical awareness. Qualitative analyses further reveal its pedagogical benefits, including demystifying AI through relatable and engaging learning, supporting student comprehension and skill mastery, and nurturing critical thinking and attitudes. The analogy-based approach contributes to the field of K-12 AI education with an age-appropriate, child-friendly pedagogical approach. Notably, AI education should prioritize teaching for student understanding, and AI should be recognized as an independent subject with interdisciplinary applications.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 186
页数:28
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Exploring Grade 11 Students' Conceptual Pathways of the Particulate Nature of Matter in the Context of Multirepresentational Instruction
    Adadan, Emine
    Trundle, Kathy Cabe
    Irving, Karen E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 2010, 47 (08) : 1004 - 1035
  • [2] Akram B, 2022, AAAI CONF ARTIF INTE, P12681
  • [3] Design-Based Research: A Decade of Progress in Education Research?
    Anderson, Terry
    Shattuck, Julie
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2012, 41 (01) : 16 - 25
  • [4] Bloom B.S., 1971, TAXONOMY ED OBJECTIV
  • [5] Blythe Tina., 1998, TEACHING UNDERSTANDI
  • [6] Boyle G., 2015, Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs
  • [7] One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis?
    Braun, Virginia
    Clarke, Victoria
    [J]. QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 18 (03) : 328 - 352
  • [8] Bryk A. S., 2015, Learning to improve: how Americas schools can get better at getting better
  • [9] A systematic review of trends and findings in research employing drawing assessment in science education
    Chang, Hsin-Yi
    Lin, Tzung-Jin
    Lee, Min-Hsien
    Lee, Silvia Wen-Yu
    Lin, Tzu-Chiang
    Tan, Aik-Ling
    Tsai, Chin-Chung
    [J]. STUDIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2020, 56 (01) : 77 - 110
  • [10] A Holistic Approach to the Design of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Education for K-12 Schools
    Chiu, Thomas K. F.
    [J]. TECHTRENDS, 2021, 65 (05) : 796 - 807