Modeling Unsteady Surface Pressure Autospectra for Turbulent Boundary-Layer Flow over Small Dense Roughness

被引:1
|
作者
Catlett, M. Ryan [1 ]
Bryan, B. Skyler [1 ]
Chang, Natasha [1 ]
Hemingway, Hugh [1 ]
Anderson, Jason M. [1 ]
机构
[1] US Navy, Surface Warfare Ctr, Carderock Div, West Bethesda, MD 20817 USA
关键词
Boundary Layer Thickness; Wind Tunnel Tests; Streamwise Velocity; Signal Processing; Freestream Conditions; Surface Properties; Flow Conditions; Fluid Flow Properties; Fluid Mechanics; Warfare and Military Operations; STEP CHANGE; RESISTANCE; SPECTRUM; SMOOTH;
D O I
10.2514/1.J062643
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
This work concentrates on analyzing and modeling the unsteady surface pressure autospectra beneath zero-pressure gradient, turbulent boundary-layer flowfields with variably rough flow surfaces. These surface conditions are qualitatively described as being for small, dense, rigid, spatially homogeneous roughness topologies, along with corresponding quantitative parameters. Turbulent boundary-layer velocity and unsteady surface pressure data from a new wind tunnel test with multiple surface conditions are analyzed in conjunction with the compiled results from five, distinct, additional references. These compiled results are utilized to develop and propose a new empirical model for the unsteady surface pressure autospectra for a range of variably rough surfaces. This new modeling framework is approached as an extension of the Goody model, which pertains to smooth-wall flows. The variable character of the newly proposed model is controlled by parameters based on viscous scaling of the effective roughness height and friction velocity such that the surface pressure model inputs are based on readily available mean properties of the turbulent boundary-layer flowfield. For the data utilized in this analysis the approximate values of viscous scaled effective roughness height range between approximately 100 and 2000. Finally, this newly proposed model is used to compare to the unsteady surface pressure data of two additional and separate experimental references for rough-wall flows, yielding further positive comparisons as well as isolated examples of the sensitivity of analysis and modeling to the determined friction velocity for a flow configuration.
引用
收藏
页码:5514 / 5531
页数:18
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [31] The Effect of Angle of Attack and Flow Conditions on Turbulent Boundary Layer Noise of Small Wind Turbines
    Afanasieva, Nadiia
    ARCHIVES OF ACOUSTICS, 2017, 42 (01) : 83 - 91
  • [32] Scale interactions in velocity and pressure within a turbulent boundary layer developing over a staggered-cube array
    Ferreira, M. A.
    Ganapathisubramani, B.
    JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS, 2021, 910 (910)
  • [33] Statistical analysis of vortical structures in turbulent boundary layer over directional grooved surface pattern with spanwise heterogeneity
    Xu, Fang
    Zhong, Shan
    Zhang, Shanying
    PHYSICS OF FLUIDS, 2019, 31 (08)
  • [34] Effect of d-type rib roughness on the turbulent structure of side wall boundary layer for wave-current combined flow
    Hansda, Sunil
    Debnath, Koustuv
    Pal, Debashis
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 238 (01) : 186 - 208
  • [35] Coupled three-layer model for turbulent flow over large-scale roughness: On the hydrodynamics of boulder-bed streams
    Pan, Wen-hao
    Liu, Shi-he
    Huang, Li
    GEOMORPHOLOGY, 2018, 303 : 122 - 132
  • [36] Theoretical Computation of Boundary Layer Separation point over a Impeller Vane Pressure Surface in Centrifugal Pump
    Urankar, Swapnil
    Raikar, Sharad
    Bharath, N.
    Naveen, R.
    Gupta, Sourabh
    2013 THIRD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN COMPUTING AND COMMUNICATIONS (ICACC 2013), 2013, : 328 - 331
  • [37] Passive Flow Velocity and Direction Measurement System Under Interference Environment Based on the Turbulent Boundary Layer Pressure Fluctuation Field
    Wang, Yilin
    Li, Qi
    Shang, Dajing
    Tang, Rui
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT, 2024, 73