Effect of Target Changes on Target Coverage and Dose to the Normal Brain in Fractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Brain Tumors

被引:1
|
作者
Miura, Hideharu [1 ,2 ]
Kenjo, Masahiro [1 ,2 ]
Doi, Yoshiko [1 ,2 ]
Ueda, Taro [1 ,2 ]
Nakao, Minoru [1 ,2 ]
Ozawa, Shuichi [1 ,2 ]
Nagata, Yasushi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hiroshima High Precis Radiat Therapy Canc Ctr, 3-2-2 Futabanosato,Higashi Ku, Hiroshima 7320057, Japan
[2] Hiroshima Univ, Inst Biomed & Hlth Sci, Dept Radiat Oncol, 1-2-3 Kasumi Minami Ku, Hiroshima, Hiroshima 7348553, Japan
关键词
PATIENT SETUP UNCERTAINTY; LOCAL-CONTROL; BONY ANATOMY; RADIOTHERAPY; VOLUME; RADIOSURGERY; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2023.101264
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: We evaluated the dosimetric effect of tumor changes in patients with fractionated brain stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) on the tumor and normal brain using repeat verification magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the middle of the treatment period. Methods and Materials: Fifteen large intracranial metastatic lesions with fractionated SRT were scanned employing standardized planning MRI (MRI-1). Repeat verification MRI (MRI-2) were performed during the middle of the irradiation period. Gross tumor volume (GTV) was defined as the volume of the contrast-enhancing lesion on T1-weighted MRI with gadolinium contrast agent. The doses to the tumor and normal brain were evaluated on the MRI-1 scan. Beam configuration and intensity on the initial volumetric modulated arc therapy plan were used to evaluate the dose to the tumor and the normal brain on MRI-2. We evaluated the effect of D98% (percent dose irradiating 98% of the volume) on the GTV using the plans on the MRI-1 and MRI-2 scans. For the normal brain, the V90%, V80%, and V50% (volume of the normal brain receiving >90%, 80%, and 50% of the prescribed dose, respectively) were investigated. Results: Three (20% of the total) and 4 (26% of the total) tumors exhibited volume shrinkage or enlargement changes of >10%. Five (33% of the total) tumors exhibited volume shrinkage and enlargement changes of <10%. Three tumors (20% of the total) showed no volume changes. D98% of the GTV increased in patients with tumor shrinkage because of dose inhomogeneity and decreased in patients with tumor enlargement, with a coefficient of determination of 0.28. The V90%, V80%, and V50% increase with decreasing tumor volumes and were linearly related to the tumor volume difference with a coefficient of determination values of 0.97, 0.98, and 0.97, respectively. Conclusions: Repeat verification MRI for brain fractionated SRT during the treatment period should be considered to reduce the magnitude of target underdosing or normal brain overdosing. © 2023 The Author(s)
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Hippocampus, brainstem and brain dose-volume constraints for fractionated 3-D radiotherapy and for stereotactic radiation therapy: Limits and perspectives
    Gerard, M.
    Jumeau, R.
    Pichon, B.
    Biau, J.
    Blais, E.
    Horion, J.
    Noel, G.
    CANCER RADIOTHERAPIE, 2017, 21 (6-7): : 636 - 647
  • [22] Stereotactic Radiation Therapy (SRT) for Brain Metastases of Multiple Primary Tumors: A Single Institution Retrospective Analysis
    Gu, Lei
    Qing, Shuiwang
    Zhu, Xiaofei
    Ju, Xiaoping
    Cao, Yangsen
    Jia, Zhen
    Shen, Yuxin
    Cao, Fei
    Fang, Fang
    Zhang, Huojun
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2019, 9
  • [23] INCORPORATING HETEROGENEITY CORRECTION AND 4DCT IN LUNG STEREOTACTIC BODY RADIATION THERAPY (SBRT): THE EFFECT ON TARGET COVERAGE, ORGAN-AT-RISK DOSES, AND DOSE CONFORMITY
    Franks, Kevin N.
    Purdie, Thomas G.
    Dawson, Laura A.
    Bezjak, Andrea
    Jaffray, David A.
    Bissonnette, Jean-Pierre
    MEDICAL DOSIMETRY, 2010, 35 (02) : 101 - 107
  • [24] Stereotactic implantation of diffusing alpha-emitters radiation therapy sources in the swine brain: a potential new focal therapy for brain tumors
    Shoshan, Yigal
    Gomori, Moshe J.
    Moss, Lior
    Bari, Saleem Eben
    Edery, Nir
    Den, Robert B.
    Arazi, Lior
    Popovtzer, Aron
    Feldman, Jon
    Moscovici, Samuel
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2025, 172 (02) : 387 - 396
  • [25] Combined effect of dose gradient and rotational error on prescribed dose coverage for single isocenter multiple brain metastases in frameless stereotactic radiotherapy
    Yoon, Jai-Woong
    Park, Soah
    Cheong, Kwang-Ho
    Kang, Sei-Kwon
    Han, Tae Jin
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [26] Single-isocenter stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: Impact of patient misalignments on target coverage in non-coplanar treatments
    Eder, Michael Martin
    Reiner, Michael
    Heinz, Christian
    Garny, Sylvia
    Freislederer, Philipp
    Landry, Guillaume
    Niyazi, Maximilian
    Belka, Claus
    Riboldi, Marco
    ZEITSCHRIFT FUR MEDIZINISCHE PHYSIK, 2022, 32 (03): : 296 - 311
  • [27] Margin selection to compensate for loss of target dose coverage due to target motion during external-beam radiation therapy of the lung
    Foster, W. Kyle
    Osei, Ernest
    Barnett, Rob
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 16 (01): : 139 - 158
  • [28] Target dose accuracy of single-isocenter stereotactic body radiation therapy for multiple lung lesions
    Shao, Y.
    Chen, H.
    Wang, H.
    Cheng, Y.
    Zhu, Z.
    Zhuo, W.
    Kong, Q.
    Xu, Z.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2022, 20 (01): : 241 - 244
  • [29] The effect of CT-MR image registration on target volume delineation and dose distribution in radiotherapy planning of brain tumors
    Tavlayan, Emin
    Olacak, Nezahat
    Anacak, Yavuz
    TURK ONKOLOJI DERGISI-TURKISH JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY, 2011, 26 (02): : 67 - 75
  • [30] Local recurrence patterns after postoperative stereotactic radiation surgery to resected brain metastases: A quantitative analysis to guide target delineation
    Gui, Chengcheng
    Moore, Joseph
    Grimm, Jimm
    Kleinberg, Lawrence
    McNutt, Todd
    Shen, Colette
    Chen, Linda
    Bettegowda, Chetan
    Lim, Michael
    Redmond, Kristin J.
    PRACTICAL RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8 (06) : 388 - 396