Do fake reviews promote consumers' purchase intention?

被引:14
作者
Song, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Litong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhiyuan [3 ]
Hikkerova, Lubica [4 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Econ Sch, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Northeast Revitalizat & Dev Res Inst, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Sch Business & Management, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[4] IPAG Business Sch, 184 Blvd St Germain, F-75006 Paris, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fake reviews; Consumers' purchase intention; Product type; Brand awareness; Perceived value; WORD-OF-MOUTH; ONLINE PRODUCT REVIEWS; B2C E-COMMERCE; BRAND EQUITY; REGULATORY FOCUS; PERCEIVED VALUE; INFORMATION; QUALITY; IMPACT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113971
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although fake reviews are ubiquitous in the information interface that consumers browse, there is little research to understand the role of fake reviews in the online purchase process. Therefore, in this paper, we try to reveal the changes of consumers' online purchase intention after reading fake reviews in different situations. In the three studies, we found that for utilitarian products, the low fake degree of reviews could improve online purchase intention, while for hedonic products, the high fake degree of reviews could improve online purchase intention. And perceived value plays a mediating role in this process. Besides, for products with high brand awareness, fake reviews do not affect consumers' purchase intention, while for products with low brand awareness, the higher fake degree of reviews, the lower consumers' purchase intention. This paper are helpful for consumers to make more rational decisions in the face of fake information, have reference significance for marketers to choose reasonable ways to promote products in specific situations, and help optimize the supervision mechanism of online reviews.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 128 条
[21]   Understanding customers' repeat purchase intentions in B2C e-commerce: the roles of utilitarian value, hedonic value and perceived risk [J].
Chiu, Chao-Min ;
Wang, Eric T. G. ;
Fang, Yu-Hui ;
Huang, Hsin-Yi .
INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2014, 24 (01) :85-114
[22]   The Effect of Online Consumer Reviews on New Product Sales [J].
Cui, Geng ;
Lui, Hon-Kwong ;
Guo, Xiaoning .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC COMMERCE, 2012, 17 (01) :39-57
[23]   Bridging the online offline gap: Assessing the impact of brands' social network content quality on brand awareness and purchase intention [J].
Dabbous, Amal ;
Barakat, Karine Aoun .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2020, 53
[24]   Evaluating the influence of YouTube advertising for attraction of young customers [J].
Dehghani, Milad ;
Niaki, Mojtaba Khorram ;
Ramezani, Iman ;
Sali, Rasoul .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 59 :165-172
[25]   Strategic manipulation of Internet opinion forums: Implications for consumers and firms [J].
Dellarocas, Chrysanthos .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2006, 52 (10) :1577-1593
[26]   Consumer choice between hedonic and utilitarian goods [J].
Dhar, R ;
Wertenbroch, K .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2000, 37 (01) :60-71
[27]   EFFECTS OF PRICE, BRAND, AND STORE INFORMATION ON BUYERS PRODUCT EVALUATIONS [J].
DODDS, WB ;
MONROE, KB ;
GREWAL, D .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1991, 28 (03) :307-319
[28]   An Adaptive Large Neighborhood Search for an E-grocery Delivery Routing Problem [J].
Emec, Ugur ;
Catay, Bulent ;
Bozkaya, Burcin .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2016, 69 :109-125
[29]   Effects of online review positiveness and review score inconsistency on sales: A comparison by product involvement [J].
Eslami, Seyed Pouyan ;
Ghasemaghaei, Maryam .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING AND CONSUMER SERVICES, 2018, 45 :74-80
[30]   Is TripAdvisor still relevant? The influence of review credibility, review usefulness, and ease of use on consumers' continuance intention [J].
Filieri, Raffaele ;
Acikgoz, Fulya ;
Ndou, Valentina ;
Dwivedi, Yogesh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2021, 33 (01) :199-223