Do fake reviews promote consumers' purchase intention?

被引:15
作者
Song, Yang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Litong [1 ]
Zhang, Zhiyuan [3 ]
Hikkerova, Lubica [4 ]
机构
[1] Jilin Univ, Econ Sch, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Northeast Revitalizat & Dev Res Inst, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Sch Business & Management, Changchun 130012, Peoples R China
[4] IPAG Business Sch, 184 Blvd St Germain, F-75006 Paris, France
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fake reviews; Consumers' purchase intention; Product type; Brand awareness; Perceived value; WORD-OF-MOUTH; ONLINE PRODUCT REVIEWS; B2C E-COMMERCE; BRAND EQUITY; REGULATORY FOCUS; PERCEIVED VALUE; INFORMATION; QUALITY; IMPACT; TRUST;
D O I
10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113971
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Although fake reviews are ubiquitous in the information interface that consumers browse, there is little research to understand the role of fake reviews in the online purchase process. Therefore, in this paper, we try to reveal the changes of consumers' online purchase intention after reading fake reviews in different situations. In the three studies, we found that for utilitarian products, the low fake degree of reviews could improve online purchase intention, while for hedonic products, the high fake degree of reviews could improve online purchase intention. And perceived value plays a mediating role in this process. Besides, for products with high brand awareness, fake reviews do not affect consumers' purchase intention, while for products with low brand awareness, the higher fake degree of reviews, the lower consumers' purchase intention. This paper are helpful for consumers to make more rational decisions in the face of fake information, have reference significance for marketers to choose reasonable ways to promote products in specific situations, and help optimize the supervision mechanism of online reviews.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 128 条
  • [1] Sometimes it just feels right: The differential weighting of affect-consistent and affect-inconsistent product information
    Adaval, R
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2001, 28 (01) : 1 - 17
  • [2] Modeling consumer distrust of online hotel reviews
    Ahmad, Wasim
    Sun, Jin
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 71 : 77 - 90
  • [3] DIMENSIONS OF CONSUMER EXPERTISE
    ALBA, JW
    HUTCHINSON, JW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1987, 13 (04) : 411 - 454
  • [4] Learning from the Crowd: Regression Discontinuity Estimates of the Effects of an Online Review Database
    Anderson, Michael
    Magruder, Jeremy
    [J]. ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2012, 122 (563) : 957 - 989
  • [5] How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions
    Avnet, T
    Higgins, ET
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2006, 43 (01) : 1 - 10
  • [6] Product type and consumers' perception of online consumer reviews
    Bae, Soonyong
    Lee, Taesik
    [J]. ELECTRONIC MARKETS, 2011, 21 (04) : 255 - 266
  • [7] Banerjee S., 2014, 9 INT C DIGITAL INFO
  • [8] A framework for fake review detection in online consumer electronics retailers
    Barbado, Rodrigo
    Araque, Oscar
    Iglesias, Carlos A.
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT, 2019, 56 (04) : 1234 - 1244
  • [9] Batra R., 1991, Marketing Letters, V2, P159, DOI [10.1007/BF00436035, DOI 10.1007/BF00436035]
  • [10] Do Real and Fictitious Plant Brands Differ in Brand Recognition, Awareness, Purchase Intention, and Visual Activity?
    Behe, Bridget K.
    Huddleston, Patricia T.
    Hall, Charles R.
    Khachatryan, Hayk
    Campbell, Benjamin
    [J]. HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (04) : 612 - 621