共 50 条
Biometric Risk Factors for Angle Closure Progression After Laser Peripheral Iridotomy
被引:9
|作者:
Bao, Yicheng K.
[1
]
Xu, Benjamin Y.
[1
,10
]
Friedman, David S.
[2
]
Cho, Austin
[1
]
Foster, Paul J.
[3
,4
]
Jiang, Yu
[5
]
Porporato, Natalia
[6
,7
,8
]
Pardeshi, Anmol A.
[1
]
Jiang, Yuzhen
[5
]
Munoz, Beatriz
[9
]
Aung, Tin
[6
,7
]
He, Mingguang
[5
]
机构:
[1] Univ Southern Calif, Roski Eye Inst, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Glaucoma Ctr Excellence, Massachusetts Eye & Ear, Boston, MA USA
[3] Moorfields Eye Hosp, NIHR Biomed Res Ctr, London, England
[4] UCL Inst Ophthalmol, London, England
[5] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Zhongshan Ophthalm Ctr, State Key Lab Ophthalmol, Guangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Singapore Eye Res Inst, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Singapore Natl Eye Ctr, Singapore, Singapore
[8] Natl Univ Singapore, Duke NUS Med Sch, Singapore, Singapore
[9] Johns Hopkins Univ, Wilmer Eye Inst, Baltimore, MD USA
[10] Univ Southern Calif, Roski Eye Inst, Keck Sch Med, 1450 San Pablo St,4th Floor,Ste 4700, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
基金:
美国国家卫生研究院;
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词:
ANTERIOR SEGMENT PARAMETERS;
GLAUCOMA;
PREVENTION;
PREVALENCE;
LENS;
D O I:
10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.0937
中图分类号:
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号:
100212 ;
摘要:
IMPORTANCE Laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is the most common primary treatment for primary angle closure disease (PACD). However, there are sparse data guiding the longitudinal care of PAC suspect (PACS) eyes after LPI. OBJECTIVE To elucidate the anatomic effects of LPI that are associated with a protective outcome against progression from PACS to PAC and acute angle closure (AAC) and to identify biometric factors that predict progression after LPI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Thiswas a retrospective analysis of data from the Zhongshan Angle Closure Prevention (ZAP) trial, a study of mainland Chinese people aged 50 to 70 years with bilateral PACS who received LPI in 1 randomly selected eye. Gonioscopy and anterior-segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) imaging were performed 2 weeks after LPI. Progression was defined as the development of PAC or an acute angle closure (AAC) attack. Cohort A included a random mix of treated and untreated eyes, and cohort B included only eyes treated with LPI. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were developed to assess biometric risk factors for progression in cohorts A and B. Data were analyzed from January 4 to December 22, 2022. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE Six-year progression to PAC or AAC. RESULTS Cohort A included 878 eyes from 878 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [5.0] years; 726 female [82.7%]) of whom 44 experienced progressive disease. In a multivariable analysis, treatment (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.34-1.33; P =.25) was no longer associated with progression after adjusting for age and trabecular iris space area at 500 mu m (TISA at 500 mu m) at the 2-week visit. Cohort B included 869 treated eyes from 869 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.9 [5.0] years; 717 female [82.5%]) of whom 19 experienced progressive disease. In multivariable analysis, TISA at 500 mu m (HR, 1.33 per 0.01mm2 smaller; 95% CI, 1.12-1.56; P =.001) and cumulative gonioscopy score (HR, 1.25 per grade smaller; 95% CI, 1.03-1.52; P =.02) at the 2-week visit were associated with progression. Persistent angle narrowing on AS-OCT (TISA at 500 mu m <= 0.05mm2; HR, 9.41; 95% CI, 3.39-26.08; P <.001) or gonioscopy (cumulative score <= 6; HR, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.13-6.93; P =.04) conferred higher risk of progression. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Study results suggest that persistent angle narrowing detected by AS-OCT or cumulative gonioscopy score was predictive of disease progression in PACS eyes after LPI. These findings suggest that AS-OCT and gonioscopymay be performed to identify patients at high risk of developing angle closure who may benefit from closer monitoring despite patent LPI.
引用
收藏
页码:516 / 524
页数:9
相关论文