A collective blueprint, not a crystal ball: How expectations and participation shape long-term energy scenarios

被引:5
作者
Goeke, Leonard [1 ,2 ]
Weibezahn, Jens [1 ,3 ]
von Hirschhausen, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Workgrp Infrastruct Policy WIP, Strassedes 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[2] German Inst Econ Res DIW Berlin, Environm Dept, Energy, Transportat, Mohrenstr 58, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Copenhagen Sch Energy Infrastruct CSEI, Dept Econ, Porcelaenshaven 16A, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Energy scenarios; Planning models; Fictional expectations; Macro -energy systems; Energy futures; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ELECTRICITY; FUTURES; GERMANY; POLITICS; MODELS; POLICY; POWER; FEASIBILITY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2023.102957
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The development of energy systems is not a technocratic process but equally shaped by societal and cultural forces. Key instruments in this process are model-based scenarios describing a future energy system. Applying the concept of fictional expectations from social economics, we show how energy scenarios are tools to channel political, economic, and academic efforts into a common direction. To impact decision-making, scenarios do not have to be accurate - but credible and evoke coherent expectations in diverse stakeholders. To gain credibility, authors of scenarios engage with stakeholders and appeal to the authority of institutions or quantitative methods.From these insights on energy scenarios, we draw consequences for developing and applying planning models, the quantitative tool energy scenarios build on. Planning models should be open and accessible to facilitate stakeholder participation, avoid needlessly complex methods to minimize expert bias and aim for a large scope to be policy relevant. Rather than trying to simulate social preferences and convictions within engineering models, scenario development should pursue broad and active participation of all stakeholders, including citizens.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 128 条
  • [61] TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF IIASA ENERGY SCENARIOS
    KEEPIN, B
    WYNNE, B
    [J]. NATURE, 1984, 312 (5996) : 691 - 695
  • [62] Kendziorski M., 2021, 2930 DIW WKLY REP, DOI [10.18723/diw_wb:2021-29-1, DOI 10.18723/DIW_WB:2021-29-1]
  • [63] Centralized and decentral approaches to succeed the 100% energiewende in Germany in the European context - A model-based analysis of generation, network, and storage investments
    Kendziorski, Mario
    Goeke, Leonard
    von Hirschhausen, Christian
    Kemfert, Claudia
    Zozmann, Elmar
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2022, 167
  • [64] Review on 100% Renewable Energy System Analyses-A Bibliometric Perspective
    Khalili, Siavash
    Breyer, Christian
    [J]. IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 : 125792 - 125834
  • [65] Hybrid Hydrogen Home Storage for Decentralized Energy Autonomy
    Knosala, Kevin
    Kotzur, Leander
    Roeben, Fritz T. C.
    Stenzel, Peter
    Blum, Ludger
    Robinius, Martin
    Stolten, Detlef
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (42) : 21748 - 21763
  • [66] Kost C., 2018, Stromgestehungskosten Erneuerbare Energien Marz 2018
  • [67] Krause F., 1980, ENERGIE WENDE WACHST
  • [68] Modelling social aspects of the energy transition: What is the current representation of social factors in energy models?
    Krumm, Alexandra
    Suesser, Diana
    Blechinger, Philipp
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [69] A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom
    Laes, Erik
    Gorissen, Leen
    Nevens, Frank
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (03) : 1129 - 1152
  • [70] Landis F, 2019, SWISS J EC STAT, V155, P12, DOI DOI 10.1186/S41937-019-0040-8