A collective blueprint, not a crystal ball: How expectations and participation shape long-term energy scenarios

被引:5
作者
Goeke, Leonard [1 ,2 ]
Weibezahn, Jens [1 ,3 ]
von Hirschhausen, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Berlin, Workgrp Infrastruct Policy WIP, Strassedes 17 Juni 135, D-10623 Berlin, Germany
[2] German Inst Econ Res DIW Berlin, Environm Dept, Energy, Transportat, Mohrenstr 58, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Copenhagen Business Sch, Copenhagen Sch Energy Infrastruct CSEI, Dept Econ, Porcelaenshaven 16A, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
关键词
Energy scenarios; Planning models; Fictional expectations; Macro -energy systems; Energy futures; RENEWABLE ENERGY; ELECTRICITY; FUTURES; GERMANY; POLITICS; MODELS; POLICY; POWER; FEASIBILITY; ECONOMICS;
D O I
10.1016/j.erss.2023.102957
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The development of energy systems is not a technocratic process but equally shaped by societal and cultural forces. Key instruments in this process are model-based scenarios describing a future energy system. Applying the concept of fictional expectations from social economics, we show how energy scenarios are tools to channel political, economic, and academic efforts into a common direction. To impact decision-making, scenarios do not have to be accurate - but credible and evoke coherent expectations in diverse stakeholders. To gain credibility, authors of scenarios engage with stakeholders and appeal to the authority of institutions or quantitative methods.From these insights on energy scenarios, we draw consequences for developing and applying planning models, the quantitative tool energy scenarios build on. Planning models should be open and accessible to facilitate stakeholder participation, avoid needlessly complex methods to minimize expert bias and aim for a large scope to be policy relevant. Rather than trying to simulate social preferences and convictions within engineering models, scenario development should pursue broad and active participation of all stakeholders, including citizens.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 128 条
  • [101] Roser Max., 2020, Why did renewables become so cheap so fast? And what can we do to use this global opportunity for green growth?
  • [102] Better suited or just more complex? On the fit between user needs and modeller-driven improvements of energy system models
    Sasser, Diana
    Gaschnig, Hannes
    Ceglarz, Andrzej
    Stavrakas, Vassilis
    Flamos, Alexandros
    Lilliestam, Johan
    [J]. ENERGY, 2022, 239
  • [103] Ambitious mitigation scenarios for Germany: A participatory approach
    Schmid, Eva
    Knopf, Brigitte
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 : 662 - 672
  • [104] 'Plausible' energy scenarios?! How users of scenarios assess uncertain futures
    Schmidt-Scheele, Ricarda
    [J]. ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2020, 32
  • [105] Does political and social feasibility matter in energy scenarios?
    Schubert, Daniel Kurt Josef
    Thuss, Sebastian
    Moest, Dominik
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2015, 7 : 43 - 54
  • [106] Senkpiel C., 2020, ENERGIES, V13, DOI 10
  • [107] Shiller R. J., 2019, NARRATIVE EC STORIES
  • [108] "We Can't Be Dependent on Anybody": The rhetoric of "Energy Independence" and the legitimation of fracking in Pennsylvania
    Sica, Carlo E.
    Huber, Matthew
    [J]. EXTRACTIVE INDUSTRIES AND SOCIETY-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2017, 4 (02): : 337 - 343
  • [109] What do energy modellers know? An ethnography of epistemic values and knowledge models
    Silvast, Antti
    Laes, Erik
    Abram, Simone
    Bombaerts, Gunter
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2020, 66
  • [110] Energy, economics, and performativity: Reviewing theoretical advances in social studies of markets and energy
    Silvast, Antti
    [J]. ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 34 : 4 - 12