Dropout risk and effectiveness of retention strategies in the Memory Advancement by Intranasal Insulin in Type 2 Diabetes (MemAID) Clinical Trial

被引:0
作者
Isaza-Pierrotti, Daniel F. [1 ,5 ]
Khan, Faizan [1 ]
Novak, Peter [2 ]
Lioutas, Vasileios [1 ]
Mantzoros, C. S. [3 ,6 ]
Ngo, Long H. [4 ]
Novak, Vera [1 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Faulkner Hosp, Dept Neurol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Med, Boston, MA USA
[5] Fdn Valle Lili, Ctr Invest Clin, Cali, Colombia
[6] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Med, Boston VA Healthcare Syst, Boston, MA USA
[7] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Neurol, 185 Pilgrim Rd, Boston, MA 02215 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Clinical trial; Dropout risk; Memory Advancement with Intranasal Insulin; in Type 2 Diabetes (MemAID) trial; Recruitment; Retention; Type; 2; diabetes; PREDICTORS; PARTICIPATION; ATTRITION;
D O I
10.1016/j.cct.2022.107057
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Effective recruitment and retention strategies are essential in clinical trials.Methods: The MemAID trial consisted of 12 visits during 24 weeks of intranasal insulin or placebo treatment and 24 weeks of post-treatment follow-up in older people with and without diabetes. Enhanced retention strategies were implemented mid study to address high drop-out rate. Baseline variables used in Cox regression models to identify dropout risk factors were: demographics and social characteristics, functional measures, metabolic and cardiovascular parameters, and medications.Results: 244 participants were randomized; 13 (5.3%) were discontinued due to adverse events. From the remaining 231 randomized participants, 65 (28.1%) dropped out, and 166 (71.9%) did not. The Non-retention group included 95 participants not exposed to retention strategies, of which 43 (45.2%) dropped out. The Retention group included 136 participants exposed to enhanced retention strategies, of which 22 (16.2%) dropped out. Dropout risk factors included being unmarried, a longer diabetes duration, using oral antidiabetics as compared to not using, worse executive function and chronic pain. After adjusting for exposure to retention strategies, worse baseline executive function composite score (p = 0.001) and chronic pain diagnosis (p = 0.032) were independently associated with a greater risk of dropping out. The probability of dropping out decreased with longer exposure to retention strategies and the dropout rate per month decreased from 4.1% to 1.8% (p = 0.04) on retention strategies.Conclusions: Baseline characteristics allow prediction of dropping out from a clinical trial in older participants. Retention strategies has been effective at minimizing the impact of dropout-related risk factors. Trial Registration: Clinical trials.gov NCT2415556 3/23/2015 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
    Abshire, Martha
    Dinglas, Victor D.
    Cajita, Maan Isabella A.
    Eakin, Michelle N.
    Needham, Dale M.
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl Dennison
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2017, 17
  • [2] Aponte Becerra L., ARCH DIAB OBESITY, V4, P403, DOI [10.32474/ADO.2022.04. 000182, DOI 10.32474/ADO.2022.04.000182]
  • [3] Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities
    Bower, Peter
    Brueton, Valerie
    Gamble, Carrol
    Treweek, Shaun
    Smith, Catrin Tudur
    Young, Bridget
    Williamson, Paula
    [J]. TRIALS, 2014, 15
  • [4] Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials
    Brueton, Valerie C.
    Tierney, Jayne
    Stenning, Sally
    Harding, Seeromanie
    Meredith, Sarah
    Nazareth, Irwin
    Rait, Greta
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2013, (12):
  • [5] Predicting medication adherence in older Hispanic patients with type 2 diabetes
    Caballero, Joshua
    Ownby, Raymond L.
    Jacobs, Robin J.
    Pandya, Naushira
    Hardigan, Patrick C.
    Ricabal, Lazara C.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2018, 75 (09) : E194 - E201
  • [6] Cambridge Cognition Ltd, 2012, CANTAB Eclipse Test Administration Guide
  • [7] Chaudhari Nayan, 2020, Perspect Clin Res, V11, P64, DOI 10.4103/picr.PICR_206_19
  • [8] Depression, smoking, activity level, and health status: Pretreatment predictors of attrition in obesity treatment
    Clark, MM
    Niaura, R
    King, TK
    Pera, V
    [J]. ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 1996, 21 (04) : 509 - 513
  • [9] Recruitment and Retention of Older People in Clinical Research: A Systematic Literature Review
    Forsat, Noah D.
    Palmowski, Andriko
    Palmowski, Yannick
    Boers, Maarten
    Buttgereit, Frank
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 (12) : 2955 - 2963
  • [10] Memory advancement by intranasal insulin in type 2 diabetes (MemAID) randomized controlled clinical trial: Design, methods and rationale
    Galindo-Mendez, B.
    Trevino, J. A.
    McGlinchey, R.
    Fortier, C.
    Lioutas, V
    Novak, P.
    Mantzoros, C. S.
    Ngo, L.
    Novak, V
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 89