Conversion of food waste to renewable energy: A techno-economic and environmental assessment

被引:39
作者
Chen, Yunzhi [1 ]
Pinegar, Lizzie [1 ]
Immonen, Jake [1 ]
Powell, Kody M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Chem Engn, 50 South Cent Campus Dr, 3290 MEB, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Dept Mech Engn, 1495 E 100 S, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
基金
美国能源部;
关键词
Food waste; Renewable natural gas; Anaerobic digestion; Waste-to-energy; Economic assessment; Environmental assessment; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; BIOENERGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135741
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Increasing quantities of food waste have become a concern due to high disposal costs in landfills and high greenhouse gas emissions. With this increase in food waste generation, there is also an increasing demand for renewable natural gas to supplement traditional fossil fuel combustion and offset the impacts of climate change. Collecting food waste from landfills and turning it into renewable natural gas using anaerobic digestion could be a win-win option for both food waste disposal and renewable energy production. While some literature exists on the energy potential, economic feasibility, and environmental benefit of food waste disposal via anaerobic digestion, no existing study simultaneously evaluates the energy, economic and environmental effect of food waste to renewable energy via anaerobic digestion, especially on a plant and city scale. This study is focused on the techno-economic and environmental assessment of food waste to energy via anaerobic digestion in order to fill this gap. Four anaerobic digestion pathways are considered in this study: flare, pipeline natural gas, combined heat and power, and combined cycle for efficient power generation. Using a city of 1 M people the results show that renewable natural gas from food waste could supply the natural gas usage for 1.9% of residential use, 2.7% of commercial use, 1.1% of industrial use, 167.5% of the compressed natural gas vehicle fleet, 0.7% of electric power generation, or 2.5% of industrial high-temperature heating processes. All pathways except pipeline nat-ural gas will have a positive net present value in the baseline scenario, and the pipeline natural gas pathway will become economically viable with a net present value of 31 USD/t of food waste with renewable energy credits. Lastly, all of the pathways achieve negative greenhouse gas emissions, which indicates that anaerobic digestion is a more environmentally friendly method for the handling of food waste than landfills.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   The role of sustainability assessment tools in realizing bioenergy and bioproduct systems [J].
Aghbashlo, Mortaza ;
Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa ;
Shahbeik, Hossein ;
Tabatabaei, Meisam .
BIOFUEL RESEARCH JOURNAL-BRJ, 2022, 9 (03) :1697-1706
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Opportunities for Combined Heat and Power at Wastewater Treatment Facilities: Market Analysis and Lessons from the Field
[3]  
Arati James M., 2006, EVALUATING EC FEASIB
[4]   An economic analysis of the role of materials, system engineering, and performance in electrochemical carbon dioxide conversion to formate [J].
Badgett, Alex ;
Ruth, Mark ;
Crow, Allison ;
Grim, Gary ;
Chen, Yingying ;
Hu, Leiming ;
Tao, Ling ;
Smith, Wilson ;
Neyerlin, K. C. ;
Cortright, Randy .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 351
[5]   Food waste disposal and utilization in the United States: A spatial cost benefit analysis [J].
Badgett, Alex ;
Milbrandt, Anelia .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 314
[6]   Bioenergy Potential from Food Waste in California [J].
Breunig, Hanna M. ;
Jin, Ling ;
Robinson, Alastair ;
Scown, Corinne D. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 51 (03) :1120-1128
[7]  
Cai H., 2015, UPDATED VENTED FLARI
[8]   Sustainability of food waste biorefinery: A review on valorisation pathways, techno-economic constraints, and environmental assessment [J].
Caldeira, Carla ;
Vlysidis, Anestis ;
Fiore, Gianluca ;
De Laurentiis, Valeria ;
Vignali, Giuseppe ;
Sala, Serenella .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 312
[9]  
de Vries A., 2005, EC FEASIBILITY ANAER, DOI [10.32473/edis-an159-2005, DOI 10.32473/EDIS-AN159-2005]
[10]   Life cycle assessment to compare the environmental impact of seven contemporary food waste management systems [J].
Edwards, Joel ;
Othman, Maazuza ;
Crossin, Enda ;
Burn, Stewart .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 248 :156-173