A lesson in humility: the added values of PET-MRI over PET-CT in detecting malignant hepatic lesions

Purpose The recent introduction of integrated PET-MRI systems into practice seems promising in oncologic imaging, and efforts are made to specify their added values. The current study evaluates the added values of PET-MRI over PET-CT in detecting active malignant hepatic lesions.Methods As part of an ongoing prospective study in our institution that assesses the added values of PET-MRI, subjects undergo PET-CT and subsequent PET-MRI after single radiotracer injection. The current study included 97 pairs of whole body PET-CT and liver PET-MRI scans, of 61 patients (19/61 had >= 2 paired scans), all performed with [F-18]FDG and interpreted as showing active malignant hepatic involvement. Primary malignancies were of colorectal/biliary/pancreatic/ breast/other origins in 19/9/9/7/17 patients. Monitoring response to therapy was the indication in 86/97 cases. When PETMRI detected additional malignant lesions over PET-CT, lesions size, their characteristics on PET-MRI, and the influence on the final report were recorded. Results In 37/97 (38.1%) cases, a total of 78 malignant lesions were identified on PET-MRI but not on PET-CT: 19 lesions (11 cases) were identified on PET of PET-MRI but not on PET of PET-CT; 37 lesions (14 cases) were small (<= 0.8 cm) and identified on MRI only; 22 lesions (12 cases) were > 0.8 cm, had low/no [F-18]FDG uptake, but were categorized as viable based on MRI. These 78 lesions caused major effect on final reports in 11/97 (11.3%) cases, changing reported response assessment category (10/86 cases) or defining malignant hepatic disease on staging/restaging scans (1/11 cases).Conclusion PET-MRI offers several advantages over PET-CT in assessing the extent and response to therapy of malignant hepatic involvement. Additional malignant lesions detected on PET-MRI are attributed to superior PET performance (compared with PET of PET-CT), greater spatial resolution provided by MRI, and improved multi-parametric viability assessment. In around one-tenth of cases, findings identified on PET-MRI but not on PET-CT significantly change the final report's conclusion.