Impacts of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Pedestrian Push-Button Utilization and Pedestrian Volume Model Accuracy in Utah

被引:2
作者
Runa, Ferdousy [1 ]
Singleton, Patrick A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, State Coll, PA USA
[2] Utah State Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Logan, UT 84322 USA
关键词
operations; traffic signal systems; pedestrians and bicycles; pedestrians; bicycles; human factors; crossing;
D O I
10.1177/03611981221089935
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This work investigated the impacts of COVID-19 on pedestrian behavior, answering two research questions using pedestrian push-button data from Utah traffic signals: How did push-button utilization change during the early pandemic, owing to concerns over disease spread through high-touch surfaces? How did the accuracy of pedestrian volume estimation models (developed pre-COVID based on push-button traffic signal data) change during the early pandemic? To answer these questions, we first recorded videos, counted pedestrians, and collected push-button data from traffic signal controllers at 11 intersections in Utah in 2019 and 2020. We then compared changes in push-button presses per pedestrian (to measure utilization), as well as model prediction errors (to measure accuracy), between the two years. Our first hypothesis of decreased push-button utilization was partially supported. The changes in utilization at most (seven) signals were not statistically significant; yet, the aggregate results (using 10 of 11 signals) saw a decrease from 2.1 to 1.5 presses per person. Our second hypothesis of no degradation of model accuracy was supported. There was no statistically significant change in accuracy when aggregating across nine signals, and the models were actually more accurate in 2020 for the other two signals. Overall, we concluded that COVID-19 did not significantly deter people from using push-buttons at most signals in Utah, and that the pedestrian volume estimation methods developed in 2019 probably do not need to be recalibrated to work for COVID conditions. This information may be useful for public health actions, signal operations, and pedestrian planning.
引用
收藏
页码:494 / 502
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
ATKINS, 2016, AUT TRAFF SIGN PERF
[2]   Insights into the impact of COVID-19 on household travel and activities in Australia - The early days under restrictions [J].
Beck, Matthew J. ;
Hensher, David A. .
TRANSPORT POLICY, 2020, 96 :76-93
[3]  
Combs T., 2020, Local actions to support walking and cycling during social distancing dataset
[4]   The effect of COVID-19 and subsequent social distancing on travel behavior [J].
De Vos, Jonas .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 5
[5]  
Islam A., 2021, THESIS UTAH STATE U
[6]   Impacts of COVID-19 on public transport ridership in Sweden: Analysis of ticket validations, sales and passenger counts [J].
Jenelius, Erik ;
Cebecauer, Matej .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH INTERDISCIPLINARY PERSPECTIVES, 2020, 8
[7]   Bicycle and Pedestrian Counts at Signalized Intersections Using Existing Infrastructure Opportunities and Challenges [J].
Kothuri, Sirisha ;
Nordback, Krista ;
Schrope, Andrew ;
Phillips, Taylor ;
Figliozzi, Miguel .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2644) :11-18
[8]   Assessing the Impacts of Weather on Pedestrian Signal Activity at 49 Signalized Intersections in Northern Utah [J].
Runa, Ferdousy ;
Singleton, Patrick A. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2021, 2675 (06) :406-419
[9]  
Salt Lake City, 2020, STAY SAF STAY ACT
[10]   Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior in Istanbul: A panel data analysis [J].
Shakibaei, Shahin ;
de Jong, Gerard C. ;
Alpkokin, Pelin ;
Rashidi, Taha H. .
SUSTAINABLE CITIES AND SOCIETY, 2021, 65