No relationships between frequencies of mind-wandering and perceptual rivalry

被引:0
|
作者
Hidaka, Souta [1 ,2 ,4 ]
Takeshima, Miyu [1 ]
Kawagoe, Toshikazu [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Rikkyo Univ, Niiza, Japan
[2] Sophia Univ, Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo, Japan
[3] Tokai Univ, Kumamoto, Japan
[4] Sophia Univ, Fac Human Sci, Dept Psychol, 7-1 Kioi Cho,Chiyoda Ku, Tokyo 1028554, Japan
来源
I-PERCEPTION | 2023年 / 14卷 / 06期
关键词
mind-wandering; perceptual rivalry; online research; questionnaires; sustained attention to response task; AGE-RELATED DIFFERENCES; EXPERIENCE; DYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1177/20416695231214888
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Our minds frequently wander from a task at hand. This mind-wandering reflects fluctuations in our cognitive states. The phenomenon of perceptual rivalry, in which one of the mutually exclusive percepts automatically switches to an ambiguous sensory input, is also known as fluctuations in our perceptual states. There may be possible relationships between the mind-wandering and perceptual rivalry, given that physiological responses such as fluctuations in pupil diameter, which is an index of attentional/arousal states, are related to the occurrence of both phenomena. Here, we investigate possible relationships between mind-wandering and perceptual rivalry by combining experimental and questionnaire methods in an online research protocol. In Study 1, we found no statistically significant relationships between subjective mind-wandering tendencies measured by questionnaires and frequencies of perceptual rivalry for Necker-cube or structure-from-motion stimuli. Study 2 replicated the results of Study 1 and further confirmed no statistically significant relationships between behavioral measurements of mind-wandering tendencies estimated by sustained attention to response task and frequencies of perceptual rivalry. These findings suggest that mind-wandering and perceptual rivalry would be based on different mechanisms, possibly higher-level cognitive and lower-level perceptual ones.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mind-wandering and individual differences in worry
    Iijima, Yudai
    Yoshihiko, Tanno
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 47 : 610 - 610
  • [42] Mind-Wandering in People with Hippocampal Damage
    McCormick, Cornelia
    Rosenthal, Clive R.
    Miller, Thomas D.
    Maguire, Eleanor A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2018, 38 (11): : 2745 - 2754
  • [43] Dreaming, Mind-Wandering, and Hypnotic Dreams
    Fazekas, Peter
    Nemeth, Georgina
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2020, 11
  • [44] Validation of the Chinese version of the Mind-Wandering Questionnaire (MWQ) and the mediating role of self-esteem in the relationship between mind-wandering and life satisfaction for adolescents
    Luo, Yangmei
    Zhu, Rongjuan
    Ju, Enxia
    You, Xuqun
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 92 : 118 - 122
  • [45] Children with positive attitudes towards mind-wandering provide invalid subjective reports of mind-wandering during an experimental task
    Zhang, Yi
    Song, Xiaolan
    Ye, Qun
    Wang, Qinqin
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2015, 35 : 136 - 142
  • [46] The neurotic wandering mind: An individual differences investigation of neuroticism, mind-wandering, and executive control
    Robison, Matthew K.
    Gath, Katherine I.
    Unsworth, Nash
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 70 (04): : 649 - 663
  • [47] The wandering mind oscillates: EEG alpha power is enhanced during moments of mind-wandering
    Compton, Rebecca J.
    Gearinger, Dylan
    Wild, Hannah
    COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2019, 19 (05) : 1184 - 1191
  • [48] The wandering mind oscillates: EEG alpha power is enhanced during moments of mind-wandering
    Rebecca J. Compton
    Dylan Gearinger
    Hannah Wild
    Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2019, 19 : 1184 - 1191
  • [49] Elucidating the difference between mind-wandering and day-dreaming terms
    Shimoni, Hagar
    Axelrod, Vadim
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01):
  • [50] Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework
    Kalina Christoff
    Zachary C. Irving
    Kieran C. R. Fox
    R. Nathan Spreng
    Jessica R. Andrews-Hanna
    Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2016, 17 : 718 - 731