Comparative analysis of greywater pollutant removal efficiency with horizontal free water surface flow wetland with other wetland technologies

被引:2
作者
Ameso, Vivien Chikogu [1 ,2 ]
Essandoh, Helen Michelle Korkor [1 ]
Donkor, Emmanuel Amponsah [1 ]
Nwude, Michael Obiekwe [2 ]
机构
[1] Kwame Nkrumah Univ Sci & Technol, Kumasi RWESCK Dept Civil Engn Coll Engn, KNUST, Reg Water & Environm Sanitat Ctr, Kumasi, Ghana
[2] Inst NWRI, Dept Water Resource & Environm Management, Natl Water Resource, PMB 2309,Mando Rd, Kaduna, Kaduna State, Nigeria
关键词
Constructed wetland technologies; Greywater treatment; Hyacinth; Pollutant removal; Horizontal free water surface flow; WASTE-WATER; CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS; PERFORMANCE; HYACINTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17637
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
The reuse of treated wastewater for agriculture and other purposes is globally recognized as a reliable water source. Constructed wetlands are cost-effective and reliable green technologies for wastewater treatment, offering an environmentally friendly and affordable solution with minimal operational and maintenance requirements. This study assessed four wetland technologies (HFWSF, VFSF, VSSF, and HSSF) for treating greywater according to regulatory standards. The technologies effectively maintained pH levels, and both treated and untreated greywater samples met FEPA limits. They efficiently reduced dissolved and suspended particles, remaining below FEPA discharge limits for conductivity, TDS, turbidity, and TSS. However, elevated ammonia levels in both treated and untreated samples required additional treatment or mitigation. Sulphate levels were successfully mitigated, and phosphorus limits were met, with HFWSF already compliant even before treatment. Nitrate levels were reduced to meet FEPA limits, ensuring regulatory compliance. While BOD limits were met in both treated and untreated samples, untreated samples exceeded COD limits, necessitating more efficient treatment methods. HFWSF and HSSF complied with COD limits, whereas VFSF and VSSF did not. Both treated and untreated samples exceeded FEPA limits for oil and grease, indicating the need for additional treatment. Untreated samples exhibited high coliform contamination levels, underscoring the importance of effective treatment. However, all technologies successfully reduced coliform levels in treated samples, meeting FEPA limits and confirming treatment effectiveness. The combination of Typha (Domingensis) in the horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland improved pollutant removal, nutrient removal, and contaminant elimination. Incorporating water Hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) with horizontal free water surface flow wetland technology demonstrated the highest efficacy in removing various pollutants. This combination outperformed other wetland technologies in effectively removing pollutants, including ammonia (60%), oil and grease (78.46%), COD (85%), TP (37.04%), FC (75%), and TC (79.59%), representing significant progress in greywater treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [11] Davis Luise, 2016, HDB CONSTRUCTED WETL, V1, P1
  • [12] ORGANIC AND INORGANIC NUTRIENTS REMOVAL FROM PIG SLURRY BY WATER HYACINTH
    DELGADO, M
    GUARDIOLA, E
    BIGERIEGO, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART A-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING & TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE CONTROL, 1995, 30 (07): : 1423 - 1434
  • [13] Greywater as an Alternative Solution for a Sustainable Management of Water Resources-A Review
    Filali, Hanen
    Barsan, Narcis
    Souguir, Dalila
    Nedeff, Valentin
    Tomozei, Claudia
    Hachicha, Mohamed
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (02)
  • [14] Performance of Phragmites Australis and Cyperus Papyrus in the treatment of municipal wastewater by vertical flow subsurface constructed wetlands
    Garcia-Avila, Fernando
    Patino-Chavez, Jhanina
    Zhinin-Chimbo, Fanny
    Donoso-Moscoso, Silvana
    Flores del Pino, Lisveth
    Aviles-Anazco, Alex
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION RESEARCH, 2019, 7 (03) : 286 - 296
  • [15] Hussain F., 2018, Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation, V9, P1, DOI [10.4172/2155-6199.1000447, DOI 10.4172/2155-6199.1000447]
  • [16] Constructed wetland, an eco-technology for wastewater treatment: A review on types of wastewater treated and components of the technology (macrophyte, biolfilm and substrate)
    Kataki, Sampriti
    Chatterjee, Soumya
    Vairale, Mohan G.
    Dwivedi, Sanjai K.
    Gupta, Dharmendra K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2021, 283
  • [17] Khazaleh M., 2019, CONSTRUCTED WETLAND
  • [18] Morel A.Diener., 2006, GREYWATER MANAGEMENT
  • [19] Nutrient removal efficiency by floating macrophytes; Lemna minor and Azolla pinnata in a constructed wetland
    Muvea, F. M.
    Ogendi, G. M.
    Omondi, S. O.
    [J]. GLOBAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND MANAGEMENT-GJESM, 2019, 5 (04): : 415 - 430
  • [20] Appropriate technology for domestic wastewater management in under-resourced regions of the world
    Oladoja N.A.
    [J]. Applied Water Science, 2017, 7 (7) : 3391 - 3406