Green hydrogen from solar power for decarbonization: What will it cost?

被引:44
作者
Garud, Sushant S. [1 ]
Tsang, Fanlok [1 ]
Karimi, Iftekhar A. [1 ]
Farooq, Shamsuzzaman [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, 4 Engn Dr 4, Singapore 117585, Singapore
关键词
LCOH; Green hydrogen; Battery; Solar; Optimal design; Technoeconomic analysis;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2023.117059
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Green hydrogen has been touted as the silver bullet for deep decarbonization. For green hydrogen to become a reality, its production must be economically competitive and practically scalable. Much effort is being devoted towards enhancing technologies such as water electrolysis, battery storage, and hydrogen storage. In this work, a detailed optimization model for designing a green hydrogen production facility with minimum landed cost of hydrogen is presented. The model is employed to study green hydrogen production in Saudi Arabia, Australia, Singapore, and Germany and to highlight the impact of geospatial solar irradiance on the facility design. The least production cost of $10.68 /kg-H2 occurs in Saudi Arabia based on the current technoeconomic landscape. The analyses highlight that storing hydrogen molecules in tanks is more economical than storing renewable electrons in batteries for producing green hydrogen. Grid-connected green hydrogen production facilities may yield lower hydrogen production cost but cannot guarantee carbon-free hydrogen. The sensitivity analyses with respect to a few technoeconomic factors highlight that massive reductions in solar panel and battery costs combined with low-interest loan incentives can make green hydrogen cost competitive. Overall, this work offers the research and industry communities a versatile and powerful tool to study the evolving technoeconomic landscape of green hydrogen production.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Storage batteries in photovoltaic-electrochemical device for solar hydrogen production [J].
Astakhov, O. ;
Agbo, S. N. ;
Welter, K. ;
Smirnov, V. ;
Rau, U. ;
Merdzhanova, T. .
JOURNAL OF POWER SOURCES, 2021, 509
[2]   Green hydrogen investments: Investigating the option to wait [J].
Biggins, Flora ;
Kataria, Mohit ;
Roberts, Diarmid ;
Brown, Solomon .
ENERGY, 2022, 241
[3]   There are hydrogen production pathways with better than green hydrogen economic and environmental costs [J].
Boretti, Alberto .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (46) :23988-23995
[4]   A whole-economy Deep Decarbonization Pathway for Mexico [J].
Buira, Daniel ;
Tovilla, Jordi ;
Farbes, Jamil ;
Jones, Ryan ;
Haley, Ben ;
Gastelum, Dennis .
ENERGY STRATEGY REVIEWS, 2021, 33
[5]  
Burke J, 2021, BLOOMBERGNEF
[6]  
Cole W. J., 2019, Cost projections for utility-scale battery storage, DOI DOI 10.2172/1529218
[7]   A green hydrogen credit framework for international green hydrogen trading towards a carbon neutral future [J].
Dong, Zhao Yang ;
Yang, Jiajia ;
Yu, Li ;
Daiyan, Rahman ;
Amal, Rose .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (02) :728-734
[8]   State-of-the-art sustainable approaches for deeper decarbonization in Europe-An endowment to climate neutral vision [J].
Elavarasan, Rajvikram Madurai ;
Pugazhendhi, Rishi ;
Irfan, Muhammad ;
Mihet-Popa, Lucian ;
Khan, Irfan Ahmad ;
Campana, Pietro Elia .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 159
[9]  
Europe, 2021, EUROPE
[10]   Current status, research trends, and challenges in water electrolysis science and technology [J].
Grigoriev, S. A. ;
Fateev, V. N. ;
Bessarabov, D. G. ;
Millet, P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2020, 45 (49) :26036-26058