Effects of feeding phytobiotics on growth performance, breast meat quality, blood biochemical indices, and liver enzymes of broiler chickens

被引:1
作者
Khatun, A. [1 ]
Das, S. C. [1 ]
Ray, B. C. [1 ]
Ahmed, T. [1 ]
Hashem, M. A. [2 ]
Khairunnesa, M. [3 ]
Roy, B. C. [4 ]
机构
[1] Bangladesh Agr Univ, Dept Poultry Sci, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
[2] Bangladesh Agr Univ, Dept Anim Sci, Mymensingh 2202, Bangladesh
[3] Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agr Univ, Dept Dairy & Poultry Sci, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh
[4] Cent Poultry Fram, Dhaka, Bangladesh
来源
EUROPEAN POULTRY SCIENCE | 2023年 / 87卷
关键词
phytobiotics; growth performance; meat quality; blood profile; liver enzymes; SANGUINARINE; PROMOTERS; TRAITS;
D O I
10.1399/eps.2023.374
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of the study was to investigate the effects of feeding different doses of phytobiotics on growth performance, breast meat quality, blood biochemical profiles, and liver enzymes of broiler chickens. A total of 480 one-day-old Cobb 500 chicks were randomly assigned to four feeding treatments with six replicates. Phytobiotics (natural extracts of Macleaya cordata plant) were administered at the following doses: no phytobiotics (control); phytobiotics at the rate of 0.15 g/kg; phytobiotics at the rate of 0.20 g/kg; and phytobiotics at the rate of 0.25 g/kg feed. A similar managemental practise was followed and corn-soya based mash diet was fed in two phases: starter (0 -14 days) and grower (15-28 days). Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and polynomial analysis was used to determine the linear and quadric effects. No significant difference in growth data was observed with the addition of phytobiotics. However, breast meat yield was significantly (P = 0.02) improved by the inclusion of phytobiotics at 0.20 g/kg feed. Lightness (L*), redness (a*), and yellowness (b*) of breast meat were significantly (P = 0.01) enhanced with increasing doses of phytobiotics at 0.25 g/kg of feed. The pH of breast meat was unchanged after 0 hours, but after 24 hours, the addition of phytobiotics had significantly decreased the pH (P = 0.03). High -density lipoprotein (HDL) (P = 0.02) and total protein (TP) (P = 0.01) levels were maximum at 0.25 g phytobiotics/kg feed. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (P = 0.01) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were decreased with increasing doses of phytobiotics. All statistically significant parameters were characterized by both linear and quadratic contrasts.Overall, the data showed that breast meat yield was improved by the addition of phytobiotics at 0.20 g/kg diet, while growth performance, breast meat quality, blood biochemical profiles, and liver functions were well maintained by the addition of phytobiotics at 0.25 g/kg diet in commercial broiler chickens.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Essential oils and their nanoemulsions as green alternatives to antibiotics in poultry nutrition: a comprehensive review
    Abd El-Hack, Mohamed E.
    El-Saadony, Mohamed T.
    Saad, Ahmed M.
    Salem, Heba M.
    Ashry, Noha M.
    Abo Ghanima, Mahmoud M.
    Shukry, Mustafa
    Swelum, Ayman A.
    Taha, Ayman E.
    El-Tahan, Amira M.
    AbuQamar, Synan F.
    El-Tarabily, Khaled A.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2022, 101 (02)
  • [2] The effect of phytogenics on growth traits, blood biochemical and intestinal histology in broiler chickens exposed to Clostridium perfringens challenge
    Abudabos, Alaeldein M.
    Alyemni, Abdullah H.
    Dafalla, Yousif M.
    Khan, Rifat Ullah
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ANIMAL RESEARCH, 2018, 46 (01) : 691 - 695
  • [3] Akyildiz S, 2016, SCI PAP-SER D-ANIM S, V59, P71
  • [4] Al-Kassie GAM., 2010, Int J Poult Sci, V9, P495, DOI [10.3923/ijps.2010.495.498, DOI 10.3923/IJPS.2010.495.498]
  • [5] Effects of phytobiotic feed additives on growth traits, blood biochemistry, and meat characteristics of broiler chickens exposed to Salmonella typhimurium
    Aljumaah, Mashael R.
    Suliman, Gamaleldin M.
    Abdullatif, Abdulaziz A.
    Abudabos, Alaeldein M.
    [J]. POULTRY SCIENCE, 2020, 99 (11) : 5744 - 5751
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2009, SAS STAT PACKAGE 200
  • [7] Aroche R., 2018, J CHEM-NY, V2018, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1155/2018/4073068, 10.1155/2018/4073068]
  • [8] Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 2016, Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, V20th ed.
  • [9] Bogosavljevic-Boskovic S., 2011, Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, V27, P1635, DOI 10.2298/BAH1104635B
  • [10] COBB RECOMMENDATION, 2014, COBB RECOMMENDATION