A New Horizon-Scanning Tool to Identify Potential Aquatic Invasive Alien Species Introduced into the Baltic Sea by Shipping

被引:4
作者
Dobrzycka-Krahel, Aldona [1 ]
Medina-Villar, Silvia [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] WSB Univ Gdansk, Business Fac, Al Grunwaldzka 238, PL-80266 Gdansk, Poland
[2] CSIC, Inst Nacl Invest & Tecnol Agr & Alimentaria, Ctr Nacl Biotecnol & Genomica Plantas CBGP, Parque Cientif & Tecnol UPM,Campus Montegancedo,Ct, Madrid 28223, Spain
[3] St Luis Univ, Nat Sci Dept, Madrid Campus,Ave Valle,34, Madrid 28003, Spain
[4] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Ciencias Vida, Jose Antonio Novais,12, Madrid 28040, Spain
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
non-indigenous species; risk assessment; shipping; Baltic Sea; SALINITY; WATER; HABITATS; PATHWAYS;
D O I
10.3390/w15030531
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Some invasive alien species (IAS) may constitute an important threat to global biodiversity due to major ecological impacts. In 2014, the European Union (EU) introduced a regulation (EU) No 1143/201 on the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of IAS. EU member states are required to carry out an analysis of the introduction and spread of potential IAS in their territories. In the case of aquatic alien species, shipping is considered as the main pathway for their introduction. In this study, a horizon-scanning tool was applied for identifying potential aquatic IAS introduced by shipping into the EU Baltic Sea Region (BSR) countries. This tool has mostly been applied on a country level, but it is more reasonable to study the invasive potentiality at a regional scale, especially for aquatic species that generally disperse over long distances. Individual Baltic countries may also benefit from the results of this study. The result of the horizon-scanning method that we applied produced a list of 27 potential aquatic invaders for the EU BSR countries introduced by international marine and inland shipping. In order, Asia (34% of the species), North America (27% of the species), and Indo-Pacific (23% of the species) were the most frequently listed geographical origins of concern. Marine habitat was the most frequent of the potential IAS, accounting for 41% of the species. Fish (26% of the species), Mollusks (18% of the species), and Crustacea (15% of the species) were the most frequent taxonomic groups. The list of potential IAS was prioritized from highest to lowest probability of invasion (establishment, spread, and impact). Eight species reached the highest probability of invasion. One of the potential IAS, Mytilus galloprovincialis, is native to the Mediterranean Region. These results provide valuable information that policy makers can use to develop more efficient prevention strategies for IAS introduced by shipping into the Baltic Sea.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [31] Identifying economic costs and knowledge gaps of invasive aquatic crustaceans
    Kouba, Antonin
    Oficialdegui, Francisco J.
    Cuthbert, Ross N.
    Kourantidou, Melina
    South, Josie
    Tricarico, Elena
    Gozlan, Rodolphe E.
    Courchamp, Franck
    Haubrock, Phillip J.
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 813
  • [32] Essential coastal habitats for fish in the Baltic Sea
    Kraufvelin, Patrik
    Pekcan-Hekim, Zeynep
    Bergstrom, Ulf
    Florin, Ann-Britt
    Lehikoinen, Annukka
    Mattila, Johanna
    Arula, Timo
    Briekmane, Laura
    Brown, Elliot John
    Celmer, Zuzanna
    Dainys, Justas
    Jokinen, Henri
    Kaaria, Petra
    Kallasvuo, Men
    Lappalainen, Antti
    Lozys, Linas
    Moeller, Peter
    Orio, Alessandro
    Rohtla, Mehis
    Saks, Lauri
    Snickars, Martin
    Stottrup, Josianne
    Sundblad, Goran
    Taal, Imre
    Ustups, Didzis
    Verliin, Aare
    Vetemaa, Markus
    Winkler, Helmut
    Wozniczka, Adam
    Olsson, Jens
    [J]. ESTUARINE COASTAL AND SHELF SCIENCE, 2018, 204 : 14 - 30
  • [33] The Baltic -: a sea of invaders
    Leppäkoski, E
    Gollasch, S
    Gruszka, P
    Ojaveer, H
    Olenin, S
    Panov, V
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2002, 59 (07) : 1175 - 1188
  • [34] An ounce of prevention or a pound of cure: bioeconomic risk analysis of invasive species
    Leung, B
    Lodge, DM
    Finnoff, D
    Shogren, JF
    Lewis, MA
    Lamberti, G
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2002, 269 (1508) : 2407 - 2413
  • [35] A pathways risk assessment of aquatic non-indigenous macroinvertebrates passing to, and through, the Central European invasion corridor
    Lipinskaya, Tatsiana
    Semenchenko, Vitaliy
    Minchin, Dan
    [J]. MANAGEMENT OF BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2020, 11 (03): : 525 - 540
  • [36] Non-toxic antifouling strategies
    Magin, Chelsea M.
    Cooper, Scott P.
    Brennan, Anthony B.
    [J]. MATERIALS TODAY, 2010, 13 (04) : 36 - 44
  • [37] Marine Environment Protection Committee, 2011, BIOF MIN TRANSF INV
  • [38] Biofouling animals in fresh water: biology, impacts, and ecosystem engineering
    Nakano, Daisuke
    Strayer, David L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 12 (03) : 167 - 175
  • [39] Bio-inspired antifouling approaches: the quest towards non-toxic and non-biocidal materials
    Nir, Sivan
    Reches, Meital
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2016, 39 : 48 - 55
  • [40] NOBANIS, 2015, TEMANORD, P229