Consensus Group Decision Making Under Model Uncertainty with a View Towards Environmental Policy Making

被引:2
作者
Koundouri, P. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Papayiannis, G. I. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Petracou, E. V. [9 ]
Yannacopoulos, A. N. [10 ]
机构
[1] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Sch Econ, ReSEES Lab, Athens, Greece
[2] Tech Univ Denmark, Dept Technol Management & Econ, Lyngby, Denmark
[3] ATHENA RC, Sustainable Dev Unit, Athens, Greece
[4] Sustainable Dev Solut Network Europe, Paris, France
[5] Org Acad Europaea, London, England
[6] Univ Piraeus, Dept Stat & Insurance Sci, Piraeus, Greece
[7] Hellen Naval Acad, Sect Math, Math Modeling & Applicat Lab, Piraeus, Greece
[8] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Stochast Modelling & Applicat Lab, Athens, Greece
[9] Univ Aegean, Dept Geog, Mitilini, Greece
[10] Athens Univ Econ & Business, Dept Stat, Stochast Modelling & Applicat Lab, Athens, Greece
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Consensus; Environmental decision making; Frechet barycenter; Group decision making; Model uncertainty; REGULATORY NETWORKS; AGGREGATION; PREFERENCES; ECONOMICS; REPRESENTATION; OPTIMIZATION; OPINION; LONG;
D O I
10.1007/s10640-024-00846-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this paper we propose a consensus group decision making scheme under model uncertainty consisting of an iterative two-stage procedure based on the concept of Frechet barycenter. Each stage consists of two steps: the agents first update their position in the opinion metric space adopting a local barycenter characterized by the agents' immediate interactions and then a moderator makes a proposal in terms of a global barycenter, checking for consensus at each stage. In cases of large heterogeneous groups, the procedure can be complemented by an auxiliary initial homogenization stage, consisting of a clustering procedure in opinion space, leading to large homogeneous groups for which the aforementioned procedure will be applied. The scheme is illustrated in examples motivated from environmental economics.
引用
收藏
页码:1611 / 1649
页数:39
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   BARYCENTERS IN THE WASSERSTEIN SPACE [J].
Agueh, Martial ;
Carlier, Guillaume .
SIAM JOURNAL ON MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 43 (02) :904-924
[2]   Consensus in multi-agent systems: a review [J].
Amirkhani, Abdollah ;
Barshooi, Amir Hossein .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE REVIEW, 2022, 55 (05) :3897-3935
[3]  
Arnaudon M., 2012, Matrix Information Geometry, P169
[4]   MEANS IN COMPLETE MANIFOLDS: UNIQUENESS AND APPROXIMATION [J].
Arnaudon, Marc ;
Miclo, Laurent .
ESAIM-PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS, 2014, 18 :185-206
[5]   Optimal management of defined contribution pension funds under the effect of inflation, mortality and uncertainty [J].
Baltas, I ;
Dopierala, L. ;
Kolodziejczyk, K. ;
Szczepanski, M. ;
Weber, G-W ;
Yannacopoulos, A. N. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2022, 298 (03) :1162-1174
[6]   Risks for the long run: A potential resolution of asset pricing puzzles [J].
Bansal, R ;
Yaron, A .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2004, 59 (04) :1481-1509
[7]   Aggregation of experts' opinions and conditional consensus opinion by the Steiner point [J].
Basili, Marcello ;
Chateauneuf, Alain .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING, 2020, 123 :17-25
[8]  
Bauschke HH., 2017, CORRECTION CONVEX AN, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-48311-5]
[9]   Asset Prices with Heterogeneity in Preferences and Beliefs [J].
Bhamra, Harjoat S. ;
Uppal, Raman .
REVIEW OF FINANCIAL STUDIES, 2014, 27 (02) :519-580
[10]   On the Bures-Wasserstein distance between positive definite matrices [J].
Bhatia, Rajendra ;
Jain, Tanvi ;
Lim, Yongdo .
EXPOSITIONES MATHEMATICAE, 2019, 37 (02) :165-191