Individualized PEEP guided by EIT in patients undergoing general anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:3
|
作者
Jiang, Lingyan [1 ,4 ]
Deng, Yanjun [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Fuqi [1 ]
Qiao, Shigang [1 ,3 ]
Wang, Chen [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Suzhou Hosp, Affiliated Hosp, Suzhou Sci & Technol Town Hosp,Med Sch,Fac Anesthe, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Med Univ, Suzhou Sci & Technol Town Hosp, Gusu Sch, Dept Intens Care Unit,Suzhou Hosp,Affiliated Hosp, Suzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Nanjing Univ, Suzhou Hosp, Affiliated Hosp, Suzhou Sci & Technol Town Hosp,Med Sch,Inst Clin, Suzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Jiaxing Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Pain Med, Affiliated Hosp, Jiaxing, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Univ, Suzhou Hosp, Affiliated Hosp, Dept Ultrasonog,Med Sch, 1 Lijiang Rd, Suzhou 215153, Peoples R China
关键词
Electrical impedance tomography; General anesthesia; Meta-analysis; Positive end-expiratory pressure; Postoperative pulmonary complications; END-EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; ELECTRICAL-IMPEDANCE TOMOGRAPHY; OBESE-PATIENTS; VENTILATION; ATELECTASIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinane.2024.111397
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: The determination of optimal positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) values in patients undergoing general anesthesia remains controversial. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) directed individualized PEEP has emerged as a novel approach to PEEP setting and has garnered increasing attention. This meta-analysis aims to systematically assess the effect of EIT-guided PEEP setting compared to traditional fixed PEEP values or other PEEP titration strategies in patients undergoing general anesthesia. Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted from inception to January 2023, with no language restrictions. The search terms used were "EIT"and "PEEP" with their corresponding free words. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and quality evaluation. The primary outcomes of interest were oxygenation index (OI), lung compliance, and number of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). The secondary outcomes included mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and number of vasoactive drug injections. RevMan 5.3 software was used to analyze the data and draw the forest plot, and Stata 14.2 software was used to conduct sensitivity analysis to assess the stability of the results. Results: 5 studies involving 272 participants were included in this meta-analysis. Our findings suggest that EIT-guided individualized PEEP setting is superior to traditional fixed PEEP values and other individualized PEEP titration methods in terms of intraoperative OI(OR = 95.73, 95%CI: (49.10, 142.37); P < 0.0001) and lung compliance(OR = 7.69, 95%CI: (5.55, 9.83); P < 0.00001), without affecting intraoperative hemodynamic parameters such as MAP(OR = 2.07, 95%CI: (-1.00, 5.13); P = 0.19) and the number of intravenous vasoactive drugs(OR = 1.22, 95%CI: (0.68, 2.21); P = 0.51) or increasing the incidence of postoperative PPCs(OR = 0.87, 95%CI: (0.41, 1.82); P = 0.71). Conclusions: Our meta-analysis suggests potential benefits of EIT-guided individualized PEEP setting in improving intraoperative oxygenation and lung compliance in patients undergoing general anesthesia. However, further research is needed to establish conclusive evidence, and caution should be exercised in interpreting these findings as the current literature remains inconclusive regarding the impact on intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative complications.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Comparison of Etomidate and Propofol Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Ye, Limin
    Xiao, Xiangyang
    Zhu, Liyi
    SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2017, 27 (01) : 1 - 7
  • [22] Effectiveness of discharge education for patients undergoing general surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gillespie, Brigid M.
    Thalib, Lukman
    Harbeck, Emma
    Tobiano, Georgia
    Kang, Evelyn
    Tobiano, Steve
    Tong, Mavis
    Clark, Justin
    Patel, Bhavik
    Chaboyer, Wendy
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2023, 140
  • [23] Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Lin
    Pang, Yi
    Wang, Yongchao
    Li, Qi
    Meng, Xiangchao
    BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [24] Microendoscopic lumbar discectomy with general versus local anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mooney, James
    Erickson, Nicholas
    Salehani, Arsalaan
    Laskay, Nick
    Mahavadi, Anil
    Ilyas, Adeel
    Mainali, Bipul
    Agarwal, Nitin
    Godzik, Jakub
    NORTH AMERICAN SPINE SOCIETY JOURNAL, 2022, 10
  • [25] Sugammadex in awakening from general anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Anzai, Adriano
    Utino, Armelin
    Tosello, Giuliano
    Katayama, Haroldo
    Spir, Ighor Alexander Zamuner
    Tristao, Luca Schiliro
    Nery, Mary Martins
    Anhesini, Mauricio
    Tiezzi, Osvaldo Silvestrini
    Spir, Patricia Rodrigues Naufal
    Otani, Pericles
    Bernado, Wanderley Marques
    REVISTA DA ASSOCIACAO MEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2022, 68 (09): : 1130 - 1153
  • [26] Ventilation Strategies During General Anesthesia for Noncardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Bolther, Maria
    Henriksen, Jeppe
    Holmberg, Mathias J.
    Jessen, Marie K.
    Vallentin, Mikael F.
    Hansen, Frederik B.
    Holst, Johanne M.
    Magnussen, Andreas
    Hansen, Niklas S.
    Johannsen, Cecilie M.
    Enevoldsen, Johannes
    Jensen, Thomas H.
    Roessler, Lara L.
    Lind, Peter Caroe
    Klitholm, Maibritt P.
    Eggertsen, Mark A.
    Caap, Philip
    Boye, Caroline
    Dabrowski, Karol M.
    Vormfenne, Lasse
    Hoybye, Maria
    Karlsson, Mathias
    Balleby, Ida R.
    Rasmussen, Marie S.
    Paelestik, Kim
    Granfeldt, Asger
    Andersen, Lars W.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2022, 135 (05) : 971 - 985
  • [27] Comparison of spinal anesthesia and general anesthesia in inguinal hernia repair in adult: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lin Li
    Yi Pang
    Yongchao Wang
    Qi Li
    Xiangchao Meng
    BMC Anesthesiology, 20
  • [28] Higher PEEP versus Lower PEEP Strategies for Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Walkey, Allan J.
    Del Sorbo, Lorenzo
    Hodgson, Carol L.
    Adhikari, Neill K. J.
    Wunsch, Hannah
    Meade, Maureen O.
    Uleryk, Elizabeth
    Hess, Dean
    Talmor, Daniel S.
    Thompson, B. Taylor
    Brower, Roy G.
    Fan, Eddy
    ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN THORACIC SOCIETY, 2017, 14 : S297 - S303
  • [29] General Anesthesia Versus Local Anesthesia in Carotid Endarterectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Harky, Amer
    Chan, Jeffrey Shi Kai
    Kot, Thompson Ka Ming
    Sanli, Dilan
    Rahimli, Rashad
    Belamaric, Zlatka
    Ng, Marcus
    Kwant, Ian Yu Young
    Bithas, Christiana
    Makar, Ragai
    Chandrasekar, Ramasubramanyan
    Dimitri, Sameh
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2020, 34 (01) : 219 - 234
  • [30] The Use of the Perfusion Index to Predict Post-Induction Hypotension in Patients Undergoing General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hung, Kuo-Chuan
    Liao, Shu-Wei
    Kao, Chia-Li
    Huang, Yen-Ta
    Wu, Jheng-Yan
    Lin, Yao-Tsung
    Lin, Chien-Ming
    Lin, Chien-Hung
    Chen, I-Wen
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2024, 14 (16)