Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias

被引:6
作者
Lu, Haidong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gonsalves, Gregg S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Westreich, Daniel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 105C McGavran Greenberg Hall CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Modeling Unit, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Program Addict Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[6] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
causal diagrams; collider adjustment bias; collider stratification bias; epidemiologic research; overadjustment bias; selection bias;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwad213
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In epidemiology, collider stratification bias, the bias resulting from conditioning on a common effect of two causes, is oftentimes considered a type of selection bias, regardless of the conditioning methods employed. In this commentary, we distinguish between two types of collider stratification bias: collider restriction bias due to restricting to one level of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) and collider adjustment bias through inclusion of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) in a regression model. We argue that categorizing collider adjustment bias as a form of selection bias may lead to semantic confusion, as adjustment for a collider in a regression model does not involve selecting a sample for analysis. Instead, we propose that collider adjustment bias can be better viewed as a type of overadjustment bias. We further provide two distinct causal diagram structures to distinguish collider restriction bias and collider adjustment bias. We hope that such a terminological distinction can facilitate easier and clearer communication.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 409
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Introduction to randomized trials: Selection bias
    Simon, E. G.
    Fouche, C. J.
    Perrotin, F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2011, 39 (11): : 667 - 668
  • [32] Selection bias in occupational sperm studies
    Larsen, SB
    Abell, A
    Bonde, JP
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 147 (07) : 681 - 685
  • [33] Selection bias in credit scorecard evaluation
    Hand, David J.
    Adams, Niall M.
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2014, 65 (03) : 408 - 415
  • [34] Registries and Selection Bias The Need for Accountability
    Krumholz, Harlan M.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES, 2009, 2 (06): : 517 - 518
  • [35] Retrospective selection bias (or the benefit of hindsight)
    Mulargia, F
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 146 (02) : 489 - 496
  • [36] Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
    Brennan C. Kahan
    Sunita Rehal
    Suzie Cro
    Trials, 16
  • [37] From bad to worse: collider stratification amplifies confounding bias in the “obesity paradox”
    Hailey R. Banack
    Jay S. Kaufman
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2015, 30 : 1111 - 1114
  • [38] ASSESSING BIAS IN CASE - CONTROL STUDIES - PROPER SELECTION OF CASES AND CONTROLS
    SUTTONTYRRELL, K
    STROKE, 1991, 22 (07) : 938 - 942
  • [39] Selection bias in case-control studies on periodontitis: a systematic review
    Lopez, Rodrigo
    Scheutz, Flemming
    Errboe, Marie
    Baelum, Vibeke
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL SCIENCES, 2007, 115 (05) : 339 - 343
  • [40] From bad to worse: collider stratification amplifies confounding bias in the "obesity paradox"
    Banack, Hailey R.
    Kaufman, Jay S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2015, 30 (10) : 1111 - 1114