Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias

被引:6
|
作者
Lu, Haidong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gonsalves, Gregg S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Westreich, Daniel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 105C McGavran Greenberg Hall CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Modeling Unit, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Program Addict Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[6] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
causal diagrams; collider adjustment bias; collider stratification bias; epidemiologic research; overadjustment bias; selection bias;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwad213
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In epidemiology, collider stratification bias, the bias resulting from conditioning on a common effect of two causes, is oftentimes considered a type of selection bias, regardless of the conditioning methods employed. In this commentary, we distinguish between two types of collider stratification bias: collider restriction bias due to restricting to one level of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) and collider adjustment bias through inclusion of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) in a regression model. We argue that categorizing collider adjustment bias as a form of selection bias may lead to semantic confusion, as adjustment for a collider in a regression model does not involve selecting a sample for analysis. Instead, we propose that collider adjustment bias can be better viewed as a type of overadjustment bias. We further provide two distinct causal diagram structures to distinguish collider restriction bias and collider adjustment bias. We hope that such a terminological distinction can facilitate easier and clearer communication.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 409
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Simultaneous adjustment of uncontrolled confounding, selection bias and misclassification in multiple-bias modelling
    Brendel, Paul
    Torres, Aracelis
    Arah, Onyebuchi A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 52 (04) : 1220 - 1230
  • [22] Adjusting for selection bias in retrospective, case-control studies
    Geneletti, Sara
    Richardson, Sylvia
    Best, Nicky
    BIOSTATISTICS, 2009, 10 (01) : 17 - 31
  • [23] Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences
    Cleave, Blair L.
    Nikiforakis, Nikos
    Slonim, Robert
    EXPERIMENTAL ECONOMICS, 2013, 16 (03) : 372 - 382
  • [24] Collider-stratification Bias Due to Censoring in Prospective Cohort Studies
    Whitcomb, Brian W.
    McArdle, Patrick F.
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2016, 27 (02) : E4 - E5
  • [25] Matched case-control data analysis with selection bias
    Lin, IF
    Paik, MC
    BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (04) : 1106 - 1112
  • [26] Is there selection bias in laboratory experiments? The case of social and risk preferences
    Blair L. Cleave
    Nikos Nikiforakis
    Robert Slonim
    Experimental Economics, 2013, 16 : 372 - 382
  • [27] The evolution of selection bias in the recent epidemiologic literature-a selective overview
    Lu, Haidong
    Howe, Chanelle J.
    Zivich, Paul N.
    Gonsalves, Gregg S.
    Westreich, Daniel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025, 194 (03) : 580 - 584
  • [28] The Importance of Covariate Selection in Controlling for Selection Bias in Observational Studies
    Steiner, Peter M.
    Cook, Thomas D.
    Shadish, William R.
    Clark, M. H.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2010, 15 (03) : 250 - 267
  • [29] Using instruments for selection to adjust for selection bias in Mendelian randomization
    Gkatzionis, Apostolos
    Tchetgen, Eric J. Tchetgen
    Heron, Jon
    Northstone, Kate
    Tilling, Kate
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 43 (22) : 4250 - 4271
  • [30] Risk of selection bias in randomised trials
    Kahan, Brennan C.
    Rehal, Sunita
    Cro, Suzie
    TRIALS, 2015, 16