Selection Bias Requires Selection: The Case of Collider Stratification Bias

被引:6
|
作者
Lu, Haidong [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gonsalves, Gregg S. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Westreich, Daniel [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, 105C McGavran Greenberg Hall CB 7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
[2] Yale Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Sect Gen Internal Med, New Haven, CT USA
[3] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Publ Hlth Modeling Unit, New Haven, CT USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Program Addict Med, New Haven, CT USA
[5] Yale Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol Microbial Dis, New Haven, CT USA
[6] UNC Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
causal diagrams; collider adjustment bias; collider stratification bias; epidemiologic research; overadjustment bias; selection bias;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwad213
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In epidemiology, collider stratification bias, the bias resulting from conditioning on a common effect of two causes, is oftentimes considered a type of selection bias, regardless of the conditioning methods employed. In this commentary, we distinguish between two types of collider stratification bias: collider restriction bias due to restricting to one level of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) and collider adjustment bias through inclusion of a collider (or a descendant of a collider) in a regression model. We argue that categorizing collider adjustment bias as a form of selection bias may lead to semantic confusion, as adjustment for a collider in a regression model does not involve selecting a sample for analysis. Instead, we propose that collider adjustment bias can be better viewed as a type of overadjustment bias. We further provide two distinct causal diagram structures to distinguish collider restriction bias and collider adjustment bias. We hope that such a terminological distinction can facilitate easier and clearer communication.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 409
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Collider stratification bias II: magnitude of bias
    Banack, Hailey R.
    Mayeda, Elizabeth Rose
    Fox, Matthew P.
    Naimi, Ashley, I
    Whitcomb, Brian W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [2] Endogenous Selection Bias: The Problem of Conditioning on a Collider Variable
    Elwert, Felix
    Winship, Christopher
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, VOL 40, 2014, 40 : 31 - 53
  • [3] Quantification of collider-stratification bias and the birthweight paradox
    Whitcomb, Brian W.
    Schisterman, Enrique F.
    Perkins, Neil J.
    Platt, Robert W.
    PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2009, 23 (05) : 394 - 402
  • [4] Correcting for Collider Effects and Sample Selection Bias in Psychological Research
    Lamp, Sophia J.
    MacKinnon, David P.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2024,
  • [5] Investigating and Remediating Selection Bias in Geriatrics Research: The Selection Bias Toolkit
    Banack, Hailey R.
    Kaufman, Jay S.
    Wactawski-Wende, Jean
    Troen, Bruce R.
    Stovitz, Steven D.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2019, 67 (09) : 1970 - 1976
  • [6] When selection becomes selection bias
    Laugesen, Kristina
    Dekkers, Olaf M.
    Groenwold, Rolf H. H.
    Skajaa, Nils
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2025, 192 (02) : E1 - E3
  • [7] Selection Bias and Information Bias in Clinical Research
    Tripepi, Giovanni
    Jager, Kitty J.
    Dekker, Friedo W.
    Zoccali, Carmine
    NEPHRON CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2010, 115 (02): : C94 - C99
  • [8] Uncovering selection bias in case-control studies using Bayesian post-stratification
    Geneletti, S.
    Best, N.
    Toledano, M. B.
    Elliott, P.
    Richardson, S.
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (15) : 2555 - 2570
  • [9] Collider scope: when selection bias can substantially influence observed associations
    Munafo, Marcus R.
    Tilling, Kate
    Taylor, Amy E.
    Evans, David M.
    Smith, George Davey
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2018, 47 (01) : 226 - 235
  • [10] A Potential Outcomes Approach to Selection Bias
    Kenah, Eben
    EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (06) : 865 - 872