A New Classification Method of Shale Reservoirs Based on the Relationship between Pore Volume and Surface Area: Shahejie Formation, Jiyang Depression, and Bohai Bay Basin

被引:3
作者
Liu, Shunyu [1 ]
Cai, Jingong [1 ]
Liu, Huimin [2 ]
Li, Xu [1 ]
Li, Zheng [2 ]
Bao, Youshu [2 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, State Key Lab Marine Geol, Shanghai 200092, Peoples R China
[2] SINOPEC, Shengli Oilfield Co, Geol Sci Res Inst, Dongying 257015, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CH4 ADSORPTION CAPACITY; ORGANIC-RICH SHALE; LOWER 3RD MEMBER; SICHUAN BASIN; GAS-ADSORPTION; PARTICLE-SIZE; FRACTAL CHARACTERIZATION; LONGMAXI SHALE; CARBON-DIOXIDE; ZHANHUA SAG;
D O I
10.1021/acs.energyfuels.3c01161
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The differentiation of fluid occurrence can occur due to the coexistence of pores and surfaces, that is, the adsorbed and free states. However, on account of the unclear relation between the pore and surface, the evaluation and classification of shale are limited from the perspective of the reservoir. In this paper, a suite of shale samples were collected from the Shahejie Formation in the Jiyang Depression for nitrogen gas adsorption, high-pressure mercury intrusion, and field emission scanning electron microscopy. We analyzed the relationship between the pore volume (PV) and specific surface area (SSA), classified the shale reservoir based on the relationship, and discussed the characteristics and significances. In this study, the shale reservoir can be divided into the pore type, surface-pore type, and surface type according to the relationships between the PV and SSA. The pore type has the smallest SSA, the largest average pore size, more mesopores and macropores, and fewer micropores. The surface-pore type has a modest average pore size and SSA, more meso- and micropores, and fewer macropores. The surface type has the smallest average pore size, the largest SSA, more micropores, and fewer meso- and macropores. The fluid in the surface type is mainly the adsorbed state, while the fluid in the pore type is mainly in the free state, and the fluid in the surface-pore type is indicative of the coexistence of the adsorbed and free state.
引用
收藏
页码:13785 / 13798
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[1]  
Ambrose R. J., 2010, NEW PORE SCALE CONSI
[2]  
[Anonymous], Mar. Pet.Geol, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0264-8172(97)00022-6
[3]   THE DETERMINATION OF PORE VOLUME AND AREA DISTRIBUTIONS IN POROUS SUBSTANCES .1. COMPUTATIONS FROM NITROGEN ISOTHERMS [J].
BARRETT, EP ;
JOYNER, LG ;
HALENDA, PP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1951, 73 (01) :373-380
[4]  
BELIVEAU D, 1993, J CAN PETROL TECHNOL, V32, P15
[5]   Specific surface area and pore size distribution in gas shales of Raniganj Basin, India [J].
Boruah, Annapurna ;
Rasheed, Abdul ;
Mendhe, Vinod Atmaram ;
Ganapathi, S. .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 9 (02) :1041-1050
[6]   Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers [J].
Brunauer, S ;
Emmett, PH ;
Teller, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1938, 60 :309-319
[7]   Pore structure and its impact on CH4 adsorption capacity and flow capability of bituminous and subbituminous coals from Northeast China [J].
Cai, Yidong ;
Liu, Dameng ;
Pan, Zhejun ;
Yao, Yanbin ;
Li, Junqian ;
Qiu, Yongkai .
FUEL, 2013, 103 :258-268
[8]   A comparative study of the specific surface area and pore structure of different shales and their kerogens [J].
Cao TaoTao ;
Song ZhiGuang ;
Wang SiBo ;
Xia Jia .
SCIENCE CHINA-EARTH SCIENCES, 2015, 58 (04) :510-522
[9]   Characterization of gas shale pore systems by porosimetry, pycnometry, surface area, and field emission scanning electron microscopy/transmission electron microscopy image analyses: Examples from the Barnett, Woodford, Haynesville, Marcellus, and Doig units [J].
Chalmers, Gareth R. ;
Bustin, R. Marc ;
Power, Ian M. .
AAPG BULLETIN, 2012, 96 (06) :1099-1119
[10]   Lower Cretaceous gas shales in northeastern British Columbia, Part I: geological controls on methane sorption capacity [J].
Chalmers, Gareth R. L. ;
Bustin, R. Marc .
BULLETIN OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2008, 56 (01) :1-21