An EEMD-SVD method based on gray wolf optimization algorithm for lidar signal noise reduction

被引:7
作者
Li, Shun [1 ,2 ]
Mao, Jiandong [1 ]
Li, Zhiyuan [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] North Minzu Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Yinchuan, Peoples R China
[2] Key Lab Atmospher Environm Remote Sensing Ningxia, Yinchuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lidar; grey wolf optimization algorithm; singular value decomposition; empirical modal decomposition; noise reduction; EMPIRICAL MODE DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
10.1080/01431161.2023.2249597
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Atmospheric lidar is susceptible to light attenuation, sky background light and detector dark current during detection, which results in a lot of noise in the lidar return signal. In order to improve the SNR and extract useful signals, this paper proposes a new joint denoising method EEMD-GWO-SVD, which includes empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), grey wolf optimization (GWO) and singular value decomposition (SVD). Firstly, the grey wolf optimization algorithm was used to optimize two parameters of EEMD algorithm according to moderate values: the standard deviation Nstd of adding Gaussian white noise to the signal and the number NE of adding Gaussian white noise. Secondly, the mode components obtained by EEMD-GWO decomposition are screened and reconstructed according to the correlation coefficient method. Finally, the SVD algorithm with strong noise reduction ability was used to further remove the noise in the reconstructed signal, and the lidar return signal with high SNR was obtained. In order to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method, the proposed method was compared with empirical mode decomposition (EMD), complete ensemble empirical modal decomposition (CEEMDAN), wavelet packet decomposition and EEMD-SVD-lifting wavelet transform (EEMD-SVD-LWT). The results show that the noise reduction effect of the proposed method was better than that of the other four methods. This method can eliminate the complex noise in the lidar return signal while retaining all the details of the signal. In fact, the denoised signal is not distorted, the waveform is smooth, the far-field noise interference can be suppressed and the denoised signal is closer to the real signal with higher accuracy, which indicates the feasibility and practicability of the proposed method.
引用
收藏
页码:5448 / 5472
页数:25
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] An EEMD-SVD-LWT algorithm for denoising a lidar signal
    Cheng, Xiao
    Mao, Jiandong
    Li, Juan
    Zhao, Hu
    Zhou, Chunyan
    Gong, Xin
    Rao, Zhimin
    [J]. MEASUREMENT, 2021, 168
  • [2] LIDAR - A NEW ATMOSPHERIC PROBE
    COLLIS, RTH
    [J]. QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 1966, 92 (392) : 220 - &
  • [3] Variational Mode Decomposition
    Dragomiretskiy, Konstantin
    Zosso, Dominique
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2014, 62 (03) : 531 - 544
  • [4] ANALYSIS OF ATMOSPHERIC LIDAR OBSERVATIONS - SOME COMMENTS
    FERNALD, FG
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 1984, 23 (05): : 652 - 653
  • [5] Golub G. H., 2012, Matrix Calculus. Translated by Yuan Yaxiang et al, P239
  • [6] Novel Inversion Algorithm for the Atmospheric Aerosol Extinction Coefficient Based on an Improved Genetic Algorithm
    Hu, Minghuan
    Li, Shun
    Mao, Jiandong
    Li, Juan
    Wang, Qiang
    Zhang, Yi
    [J]. PHOTONICS, 2022, 9 (08)
  • [7] Hua X., 2023, Journal of Coal Mine Safety, V2, P195, DOI [https://doi.org/10.13347/j.carol.carroll.nki.mkaq.2023.02.028, DOI 10.13347/J.CAROL.CARROLL.NKI.MKAQ.2023.02.028]
  • [8] Huang J. N., 2019, J BEIJING U INFORM S, V34, P69
  • [9] The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis
    Huang, NE
    Shen, Z
    Long, SR
    Wu, MLC
    Shih, HH
    Zheng, QN
    Yen, NC
    Tung, CC
    Liu, HH
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 1998, 454 (1971): : 903 - 995
  • [10] STABLE ANALYTICAL INVERSION SOLUTION FOR PROCESSING LIDAR RETURNS
    KLETT, JD
    [J]. APPLIED OPTICS, 1981, 20 (02): : 211 - 220