Machine learning in microseismic monitoring

被引:66
作者
Anikiev, Denis [1 ]
Birnie, Claire [2 ]
bin Waheed, Umair [3 ]
Alkhalifah, Tariq [2 ]
Gu, Chen [4 ]
Verschuur, Dirk J. [5 ]
Eisner, Leo [6 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, Dept 4 Geosyst, Sect 4 Basin Modelling, D-14473 Potsdam, Brandenburg, Germany
[2] King Abdullah Univ Sci & Technol, Thuwal 23955, Saudi Arabia
[3] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Geosci, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[5] Delft Univ Technol, Postbus 5, NL-2600 Delft, Netherlands
[6] Seismik sro, Kubisova 1265-8, Prague 18200, Czech Republic
关键词
Microseismic monitoring; Machine learning; Neural networks; Induced seismicity; Passive seismic; Earthquake early warning; CONVOLUTIONAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; FOCAL MECHANISM DETERMINATION; WAVE-FORM INVERSION; VELOCITY-MODEL; AUTOMATIC PICKING; FLUID-INJECTION; EVENT DETECTION; LOCATION; ALGORITHM; MAGNITUDE;
D O I
10.1016/j.earscirev.2023.104371
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The confluence of our ability to handle big data, significant increases in instrumentation density and quality, and rapid advances in machine learning (ML) algorithms have placed Earth Sciences at the threshold of dramatic progress. ML techniques have been attracting increased attention within the seismic community, and, in particular, in microseismic monitoring where they are now being considered a game-changer due to their real-time processing potential. In our review of the recent developments in microseismic monitoring and charac-terisation, we find a strong trend in utilising ML methods for enhancing the passive seismic data quality, detecting microseismic events, and locating their hypocenters. Moreover, they are being adopted for advanced event characterisation of induced seismicity, such as source mechanism determination, cluster analysis and forecasting, as well as seismic velocity inversion. These advancements, based on ML, include by-products often ignored in classical methods, like uncertainty analysis and data statistics. In our assessment of future trends in ML utilisation, we also see a strong push toward its application on distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) data and real-time monitoring to handle the large amount of data acquired in these cases.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 224 条
[1]   3D interpolation of irregular data with a POCS algorithm [J].
Abma, Ray ;
Kabir, Nurul .
GEOPHYSICS, 2006, 71 (06) :E91-E97
[2]  
Akram J., 2017, 87 ANN INT M, P2929, DOI DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2017-17761195.1
[3]  
Alam F, 2018, PROCEEDINGS OF THE 56TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS (ACL), VOL 1, P1077
[4]   MLReal: Bridging the gap between training on synthetic data and real data applications in machine learning [J].
Alkhalifah, Tariq ;
Wang, Hanchen ;
Ovcharenko, Oleg .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN GEOSCIENCES, 2022, 3 :101-114
[5]  
ALLEN RV, 1978, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V68, P1521
[6]  
Andrade J.N., 1 INT M APPL GEOSC E, P2026, DOI [10.1190/segam2021-3583194.1, DOI 10.1190/SEGAM2021-3583194.1]
[7]  
Andrade JN, 2021, GEOPHYSICS, V86, pKS175, DOI [10.1190/geo2021-0094.1, 10.1190/GEO2021.0094.1, 10.1190/geo2021-0094.1]
[8]   Joint location and source mechanism inversion of microseismic events: benchmarking on seismicity induced by hydraulic fracturing [J].
Anikiev, D. ;
Valenta, J. ;
Stanek, F. ;
Eisner, L. .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 198 (01) :249-258
[9]  
Anikiev D., 2021, First Int Meeting Appl Geosci Energy, P1661, DOI 10.1190/segam2021-3582729.1
[10]   Traveltime-based microseismic event location using artificial neural network [J].
Anikiev, Denis ;
bin Waheed, Umair ;
Stanek, Frantisek ;
Alexandrov, Dmitry ;
Hao, Qi ;
Iqbal, Naveed ;
Eisner, Leo .
FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10