Carcinogenicity testing in drug development: Getting it right

被引:3
作者
Baldrick, Paul [1 ]
Jain, Sanjay [1 ]
机构
[1] Fortrea, Prod Dev & Market Access Consulting, 5 Fdn Pk,Roxborough Way, Maidenhead SL6 3UD, England
关键词
Carcinogenicity; Regulatory agency; Rat; Mouse; Transgenic mouse; Dose level selection; DUAL CONTROL-GROUPS; TUMOR DATA; TOXICITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2023.105522
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
For a pharmaceutical drug, carcinogenicity testing occurs in rodents to identify its tumorigenic potential to allow assessment of the risk from its use in humans. Testing takes the form of 2-year studies in mice and rats and/or more recently, a 6-month study in transgenic mice. This paper examines the process of regulatory interaction regarding carcinogenicity testing, notably through the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) process to seek Executive Carcinogenicity Assessment Committee (ECAC) approval. The content of 37 submissions to CAC were examined. The paper also examines the outcome from such agency engagement, notably around study dose level selection as well as looking at the design of proposed carcinogenicity study protocols used in submissions (including numbers of animals, control group aspects and toxicokinetic [TK] evaluation). Overall, it was shown that the current process of regulatory interaction allows for studies acceptable to support eventual drug approval and marketing. However, it was established that areas exist to improve the content of submission documents and study design aspects.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2023, NDA 214103
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2023, NDA 212154
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2023, ICH S6(R1)
  • [4] Carcinogenicity evaluation: Comparison of tumor data from dual control groups in the Sprague-Dawley rat
    Baldrick, P
    [J]. TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2005, 33 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [5] Baldrick P., 2021, Mut Research - genetic Tox. Environ. Mutagen, DOI [10.1016/j.mrgentox.2021, DOI 10.1016/J.MRGENTOX.2021]
  • [6] Carcinogenicity evaluation: Comparison of tumor data from dual control groups in the CD-1 mouse
    Baldrick, Paul
    Reeve, Lesley
    [J]. TOXICOLOGIC PATHOLOGY, 2007, 35 (04) : 562 - 569
  • [7] Tg.rasH2 Mouse Model for Assessing Carcinogenic Potential of Pharmaceuticals: Industry Survey of Current Practices
    Bogdanffy, Matthew S.
    Lesniak, Jacob
    Mangipudy, Raja
    Sistare, Frank D.
    Colman, Karyn
    Garcia-Tapia, David
    Monticello, Thomas
    Blanset, Diann
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2020, 39 (03) : 198 - 206
  • [8] Regulatory Experience Assessing the Carcinogenic Potential of a Monoclonal Antibody Inhibiting PCSK9, Bococizumab, Including a 2-Year Carcinogenicity Study in Rats
    Buetow, Bernard S.
    Cappon, Gregg D.
    Aschenbrenner, Laura M.
    Updyke, Lawrence
    Torti, Vince R.
    Evans, Mark
    Dalton, Shana R.
    Bailey, Steven
    Bowman, Christopher J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY, 2022, 41 (05) : 389 - 401
  • [9] Development of a Network of Carcinogenicity Adverse Outcome Pathways and its Employment as an Evidence Framework for Safety Assessment
    Cayley, Alex N.
    Foster, Robert S.
    Hill, Emma
    Kane, Steven
    Kocks, Grace
    Myden, Alun
    Newman, Daniel
    Stalford, Susanne A.
    Vessey, Jonathan D.
    Zarei, Reza
    de Oliveira, Antonio Anax F.
    [J]. ALTEX-ALTERNATIVES TO ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION, 2023, 40 (01) : 34 - 52
  • [10] Chemical carcinogenicity revisited 3: Risk assessment of carcinogenic potential based on the current state of knowledge of carcinogenesis in humans
    Cohen, Samuel M.
    Boobis, Alan R.
    Dellarco, Vicki L.
    Doe, John E.
    Fenner-Crisp, Penelope A.
    Moretto, Angelo
    Pastoor, Timothy P.
    Schoeny, Rita S.
    Seed, Jennifer G.
    Wolf, Douglas C.
    [J]. REGULATORY TOXICOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 103 : 100 - 105