Machine Learning for Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling

被引:8
作者
Tang, Albert [1 ]
机构
[1] Thomas Jefferson High Sch Sci & Technol, 6560 Braddock Rd, Alexandria, VA 22312 USA
关键词
Machine learning; Pharmacokinetic; pharmacodynamic modeling; Recurrent neural network;
D O I
10.1016/j.xphs.2023.01.010
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
A variety of new recurrent neural networks (RNNs) including the ODE-LSTM, Phased LSTM, CTGRU and GRUD, were evaluated on modeling irregularly sampled PK/PD data with 6 or 12 time points/day and predicting PD data of unseen dosing regimens and dosing levels. The one-compartment absorption PK model and the Indirect PK/PD model I was used to simulate the PK/PD with inter-individual variabilities in volume of distribution and residual errors in PD measurement. The four RNNs were able to successfully model daily dose (QD) PK/PD and extrapolate to twice daily (BID) dose PD based on BID PK. The RNNs not only captured the additional fluctuations in the BID regimen but also the return phase to the baseline PD. However, extrapolating to unseen dose levels outside of the dose range for training proved to be challenging for all the RNNs tested. Only the GRUD demonstrated reasonable prediction results when extrapolating to unseen doses that were 3 or 10-fold outside the training doses. Overall, these new RNNs were able to overcome some limitations of previous RNNs evaluated and showed promise of integrating neural networks in PK/PD.(c) 2023 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1460 / 1475
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Improving prediction of tacrolimus concentration using a combination of population pharmacokinetic modeling and machine learning in chinese renal transplant recipients
    Wang, Yu-Ping
    Lu, Xiao-Ling
    Shao, Kun
    Shi, Hao-Qiang
    Zhou, Pei-Jun
    Chen, Bing
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [42] MACHINE LEARNING FOR TURBULENCE MODELING AND PREDICTIONS
    Bhushan, S.
    Burgreen, Greg W.
    Martinez, D.
    Brewer, Wes
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 FLUIDS ENGINEERING DIVISION SUMMER MEETING (FEDSM2020), VOL 3, 2020,
  • [43] Multimodal Machine Learning for Credit Modeling
    Nguyen, Cuong, V
    Das, Sanjiv R.
    He, John
    Yue, Shenghua
    Hanumaiah, Vinay
    Ragot, Xavier
    Zhang, Li
    2021 IEEE 45TH ANNUAL COMPUTERS, SOFTWARE, AND APPLICATIONS CONFERENCE (COMPSAC 2021), 2021, : 1754 - 1759
  • [44] Modeling reverse thinking for machine learning
    Huihui Li
    Guihua Wen
    Soft Computing, 2020, 24 : 1483 - 1496
  • [45] Modeling though Machine Learning in Robotics
    He Chao
    Wu JunJi
    Wu XiaoChuen
    ISTM/2009: 8TH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON TEST AND MEASUREMENT, VOLS 1-6, 2009, : 2851 - 2854
  • [46] Pairing conceptual modeling with machine learning
    Maass, Wolfgang
    Storey, Veda C.
    DATA & KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING, 2021, 134
  • [47] Machine Learning and Air Quality Modeling
    Keller, Christoph A.
    Evans, Mathew J.
    Kutz, J. Nathan
    Pawson, Steven
    2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIG DATA (BIG DATA), 2017, : 4570 - 4576
  • [48] Machine Learning for Modeling Human Decisions
    Reichman, Daniel
    Peterson, Joshua C.
    Griffiths, Thomas L.
    DECISION-WASHINGTON, 2024, 11 (04): : 619 - 632
  • [49] Machine learning techniques for mortality modeling
    Deprez P.
    Shevchenko P.V.
    Wüthrich M.V.
    European Actuarial Journal, 2017, 7 (2) : 337 - 352
  • [50] Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between fenofibrate and ezetimibe
    Kosoglou, T
    Statkevich, P
    Fruchart, JC
    Pember, LJC
    Reyderman, L
    Cutler, DL
    Guillaume, M
    Maxwell, SE
    Veltri, EP
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2004, 20 (08) : 1197 - 1207