Adapting the Donabedian model in undergraduate nursing education: a modified Delphi study

被引:7
作者
Ghofrani, Marjan [1 ]
Valizadeh, Leila [2 ]
Zamanzadeh, Vahid [3 ]
Ghahramanian, Akram [4 ,5 ]
Janati, Ali [6 ]
Taleghani, Fariba [7 ]
机构
[1] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Pediat Nursing, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Pediat Nursing, Tehran, Iran
[3] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Tehran, Iran
[4] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Hlth Management & Safety Promot Res Inst, Med Educ Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
[5] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Dept Med Surg Nursing, Tabriz, Iran
[6] Tabriz Univ Med Sci, Sch Management & Med Informat, Dept Hlth Serv Management, Tabriz, Iran
[7] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Nursing & Midwifery Care Res Ctr, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Education; Nursing; Delphi technique; Donabedian model; Undergraduate Program Evaluation; ACCREDITATION SYSTEMS; HEALTH; IMPROVEMENT; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-05187-7
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundDonabedian conceptual and multidimensional framework has been used in several studies in an educational context. In this study, we aimed to adapt the Donabedian three-component model (structure, process, and outcome) in undergraduate nursing education. This conceptual framework provides a comprehensive image of nursing education institutions and can help to evaluate institutions by measuring different aspects of their performance. A comprehensive understanding of the various elements of an educational institution helps to develop a complete, appropriate relevant set of performance indicators.MethodsThis was a modified Delphi study. It had three rounds. The expert panel consisted of nursing faculty members and nursing Ph.D. students. In the first round, a questionnaire was designed based on interviews, focus groups, and a literature review. Experts rated their agreement with each element on a 5-point Likert scale in rounds two and three. The consensus level was set as 75%. The stability between rounds was also determined by calculating kappa coefficients. One Sample T-Test was also calculated for new items in round three.ResultsAll 55 items of the questionnaire were confirmed in the second round based on the consensus percentage of 75. Five new items were added to the third round based on comments in round two. Eventually, all elements except one were confirmed according to the consensus level, kappa values, means, and One-Sample T-Test in round three. The structure's key elements include staff (academic and non-academic); equipment; guidelines; resources and facilities; and students' demographics and characteristics. Process key elements include communication; education; evaluation; cooperation; and consultation. Outcome key elements include knowledge development; nursing image; alumni's outcome; students' outcome; related medical centers' performance; accreditation and evaluation results; and satisfaction.ConclusionsDifferent elements of a nursing education institution at the bachelor's level were determined. The results of this study can help related bodies to develop and implement a comprehensive and systematic evaluation. These results can also be a basis for making this model useful in other nursing courses or education in other fields.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Ab LatifR., 2017, ED MED J, V9, P89, DOI [DOI 10.21315/EIMJ2017.9.3.10, 10.21315/eimj2017.9.3.10]
[2]   New Tools for Measuring Global Academic Performance [J].
Abubakar, Ahmed ;
Hilman, Haim ;
Kaliappen, Narentheren .
SAGE OPEN, 2018, 8 (03)
[3]  
Advisory Committee on Official Statistics, 2009, 3 WORLD FORUMSTATIST
[4]   Nursing in Iran: Issues and Challenges [J].
Ahmadi Chenari, Hadi ;
Zakerimoghadam, Masoumeh ;
Baumann, Steven L. .
NURSING SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 2020, 33 (03) :264-267
[5]   Large or Small Panel in the Delphi Study? Application of Bootstrap Technique [J].
Alizadeh, Somayeh ;
Maroufi, Shahnam Sedigh ;
Sohrabi, Zohreh ;
Norouzi, Azam ;
Dalooei, Reza Jafaei ;
Ramezani, Ghobad .
JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2020, 9 (15) :1267-1271
[6]   Relationships between structure, process and outcome to assess quality of integrated chronic disease management in a rural South African setting: applying a structural equation model [J].
Ameh, Soter ;
Gomez-Olive, Francesc Xavier ;
Kahn, Kathleen ;
Tollman, Stephen M. ;
Klipstein-Grobusch, Kerstin .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2017, 17 :1-15
[7]  
Anderson P, 2003, J NURS EDUC, V42, P416
[8]   Evaluating the effectiveness of bioethics education through quality standards and indicators [J].
Avci, Ercan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ETHICS EDUCATION, 2022, 7 (01) :5-19
[9]  
Bartholomew CS, 2018, An assessment of surgical oncology patient education, P51
[10]   Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process [J].
Belton, Ian ;
MacDonald, Alice ;
Wright, George ;
Hamlin, Iain .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2019, 147 :72-82