Optimal timing of follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with uncomplicated acute myocarditis

被引:1
|
作者
Pieroni, Maurizio [1 ,6 ]
Ciabatti, Michele [1 ]
Zocchi, Chiara [1 ]
Tavanti, Valentina [2 ]
Camporeale, Antonia [3 ]
Saletti, Elisa [1 ]
Fumagalli, Carlo [4 ]
Venezia, Duccio [2 ]
Lombardi, Massimo [3 ]
Olivotto, Iacopo [4 ,5 ]
Bolognese, Leonardo [1 ]
机构
[1] San Donato Hosp, Cardiovasc Dept, Arezzo, Italy
[2] San Donato Hosp, Radiol Dept, Arezzo, Italy
[3] IRCCS Policlin San Donato, Multimodal Cardiac Imaging Sect, San Donato Milanese, Milano, Italy
[4] Univ Florence, Dept Expt & Clin Med, Fiesole, Italy
[5] Meyer Childrens Hosp IRCCS, Pediat Cardiol, Florence, Italy
[6] San Donato Hosp, Cardiovasc Dept, Via Pietro Nenni 22, I-52100 Arezzo, Italy
关键词
Acute myocarditis; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Late gadolinium enhancement; Follow-up; Ventricular arrhythmias; INFLAMMATION; CARDIOLOGY; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2023.131603
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is central in the diagnosis and prognostic stratification of acute myocarditis (AM) but the timing of repeated CMR scans to assess edema resolution and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) stabilization remain unclear. We assessed edema and LGE evolution over 12 months to identify the optimal timing of repeat CMR evaluation in AM. Methods and results: Thirty-three consecutive patients with AM underwent CMR at clinical presentation (CMR-1), after 3 months (CMR-2) and after 12-months (CMR-3). CMR included assessment of edema and LGE, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left ventricular mass index (LVMi). After CMR-3 patients were followed-up every three-months by clinical evaluation, Holter-monitoring, and echocardiography. All patients had edema and LGE at CMR-1. At CMR-2 edema-positive segments (0.42 +/- 0.34 vs. 3.18 +/- 2.33, p < 0.005), LGE (4.98 +/- 4.56 vs. 9.60 +/- 8.58 g, and 4.22 +/- 3.97% vs 7.50 +/- 5.61%) and LVMi (69.82 +/- 11.83 vs 76.06 +/- 13.13 g/m(2)) (all p < 0.0001) significantly reduced, while LVEF (63.12 +/- 5.47% vs.61.15 +/- 6.87% p < 0.05) significantly improved, compared to CMR-1. At CMR-2 edema persisted in 7 patients (21%) but resolved at CMR-3 with no further changes of LVMi, LVEF and LGE. During follow-up (85 +/- 15 months), 5 (15%) patients showed persistent ventricular arrhythmias. Univariate predictors of arrhythmic persistence were LGE extension at CMR-2 and CMR-3 (both p < 0.05), but not at CMR-1 (p = 0.07). Conclusions: Most patients with uncomplicated AM show edema resolution with LGE stabilization after 3 months. Further CMR evaluations should be limited to patients with persisting edema at this time. LGE extent measured after edema resolution is associated with persistent ventricular arrhythmias.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Map to the future of cardiac magnetic resonance in myocarditis
    Haaf, Philip
    Buser, Peter T.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2017, 18 (07) : 752 - 753
  • [42] Optimal follow-up in adult patients with congenital heart disease and chronic pulmonary regurgitation: Towards tailored use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Ladouceur, Magalie
    Gillaizeau, Florence
    Redheuil, Alban
    Lserin, Laurence
    Bonnet, Damien
    Boudjemline, Younes
    Mousseaux, Elie
    ARCHIVES OF CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES, 2013, 106 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [43] Sequential Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Acute Eosinophilic Myocarditis
    Kimura, Masahiro
    Kato, Takao
    Izumi, Toshiaki
    Inoko, Moriaki
    INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 52 (19) : 2285 - 2286
  • [44] Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Myocarditis Reveals Persistent Disease Activity Despite Normalization of Cardiac Enzymes and Inflammatory Parameters at 3-Month Follow-Up
    Berg, Jan
    Kottwitz, Jan
    Baltensperger, Nora
    Kissel, Christine K.
    Lovrinovic, Marina
    Mehra, Tarun
    Scherff, Frank
    Schmied, Christian
    Templin, Christian
    Luescher, Thomas F.
    Heidecker, Bettina
    Manka, Robert
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2017, 10 (11)
  • [45] Diagnostic and prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in acute myocarditis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Blissett, Sarah
    Chocron, Yehuda
    Kovacina, Bojan
    Afilalo, Jonathan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2019, 35 (12) : 2221 - 2229
  • [46] Correlations between high sensitive troponin I and acute myocarditis extent in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging
    Marcusohn, Erez
    Barbara, Ameer
    Epstein, Danny
    Massalha, Samia
    Zukermann, Robert
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2023, 24 (06) : 334 - 339
  • [47] Multiparametric Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Discriminate Endomyocardial Biopsy-Proven Chronic Myocarditis From Healed Myocarditis
    Brendel, Jan M.
    Klingel, Karin
    Grani, Christoph
    Blankstein, Ron
    Kubler, Jens
    Hagen, Florian
    Gawaz, Meinrad
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Krumm, Patrick
    Greulich, Simon
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2024, 17 (10) : 1182 - 1195
  • [48] Persistence of Late Gadolinium Enhancement on Follow-Up CMR Imaging in Children with Acute Myocarditis
    Siddharth Dubey
    Arpit Agarwal
    Stephanie Nguyen
    Dilachew Adebo
    Pediatric Cardiology, 2020, 41 : 1777 - 1782
  • [49] Prognostic Value of Right Ventricular Function in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis Undergoing Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
    Bernhard, Benedikt
    Schnyder, Aaron
    Garachemani, Davide
    Fischer, Kady
    Tanner, Giulin
    Safarkhanlo, Yasaman
    Stark, Anselm W.
    Schutze, Jonathan
    Pavlicek-Bahlo, Maryam
    Greulich, Simon
    Johner, Caroline
    Wahl, Andreas
    Benz, Dominik C.
    Kwong, Raymond Y.
    Graeni, Christoph
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2023, 16 (01) : 28 - 41
  • [50] Preoperative and follow-up cardiac magnetic resonance imaging of candidates for surgical ventricular restoration
    Rodriguez Masi, M.
    Martin Lores, I.
    Bustos Garcia de Castro, A.
    Cabeza Martinez, B.
    Maroto Castellanos, L.
    Gomez de Diego, J.
    Ferreiros Dominguez, J.
    RADIOLOGIA, 2016, 58 (01): : 38 - 45