A comparative study of elective nodal irradiation and involved field irradiation in elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer

被引:6
作者
Dai, Yuanfei [1 ]
Huang, Di [1 ]
Zhao, Wei [1 ]
Wei, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Peoples Hosp Chuzhou 1, Dept Oncol, Affiliated Chuzhou Hosp, Chuzhou, Anhui, Peoples R China
关键词
elderly; radiotherapy; involved field irradiation; elective nodal irradiation; prognostic factor; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2023.1323908
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This comparative study aimed to explore the feasibility of involved field irradiation (IFI) in the radiotherapy of elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer, compared with elective nodal irradiation (ENI).Methods: A total of 245 elderly patients (age >= 70 years) with advanced esophageal cancer, who received radiotherapy in our department from January 2014 to December 2020, were divided into the ENI group (n=111) and the IFI group (n=134). Clinical efficacy, toxicities, survival rates, treatment failures, and multifactorial survival analyses were conducted for both groups.Results: The ENI group and the IFI group showed no significant differences in terms of short-term efficacy (91.9% vs 91.0%, P=0.814), 1-year overall survival (OS) (81.1% vs 74.6%, P=0.228), 2-year OS (22.5% vs 25.4%, P= 0.603), 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) (56.8% vs 51.5%, P= 0.198), 2-year PFS (8.1% vs 9.0%, P=0.814), regional failures (38.7% vs 31.3%, P=0.226), and distant metastasis (21.6% vs 14.9%, P=0.174). The median overall survival (OS) was 19 months in the ENI group and 18 months in the IFI group (Log-rank chi(2) = 0.012, P=0.913). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 13 months in the ENI group and 11 months in the IFI group (Log-rank chi(2) = 1.834, P=0.176). There were no significant statistical differences in both OS and PFS (P>0.05). The incidence of grade >= 3 radiation pneumonia and grade >= 3 radiation esophagitis in the IFI group was 8.2% and 11.2%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the ENI group (17.1%, P=0.034; 21.6%, P=0.026). Univariate analysis revealed that age, gender, T stage, N stage, and synchronous chemotherapy were factors affecting prognosis. Multivariate analysis showed that age, gender, T stage, and synchronous chemotherapy were independent prognostic factors, with hazard ratios of 1.227, 1.466, 2.441, and 2.714, and P values of <0.001, 0.006, <0.001, and<0.001, respectively.Conclusion: IFI is a suitable choice for elderly patients with advanced esophageal cancer, as it yields similar efficacy to ENI while reducing toxicities. Age, gender, T stage, and synchronous chemotherapy are independent prognostic factors for elderly patients with esophageal cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[11]   Feasibility of Involved-Field Conformal Radiotherapy for Cervical and Upper-Thoracic Esophageal Cancer [J].
Ma, Jin-Bo ;
Song, Yi-Peng ;
Yu, Jin-Ming ;
Zhou, Wei ;
Cheng, Er-Cheng ;
Zhang, Xi-Qin ;
Kong, Li .
ONKOLOGIE, 2011, 34 (11) :599-604
[12]   Cancer statistics, 2023 [J].
Siegel, Rebecca L. ;
Miller, Kimberly D. ;
Wagle, Nikita Sandeep ;
Jemal, Ahmedin .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2023, 73 (01) :17-48
[13]   Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries [J].
Sung, Hyuna ;
Ferlay, Jacques ;
Siegel, Rebecca L. ;
Laversanne, Mathieu ;
Soerjomataram, Isabelle ;
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Bray, Freddie .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2021, 71 (03) :209-249
[14]   The role of involved field irradiation versus elective nodal irradiation in definitive radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer- a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Wang, Hesong ;
Song, Chunyang ;
Zhao, Xiaohan ;
Deng, Wenzhao ;
Shen, Wenbin .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
[15]   Can involved-field irradiation replace elective nodal irradiation in chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Wang, Xiaoyue ;
Miao, Chuanwang ;
Chen, Zhen ;
Li, Wanhu ;
Yuan, Shuanghu ;
Yu, Jinming ;
Hu, Xudong .
ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2017, 10 :2087-2095
[16]  
Zhang AD., 2015, Sichuan Med J, V6), P774, DOI [10.16252/j.cnki.issn1004-0501-2015.06.004, DOI 10.16252/J.CNKI.ISSN1004-0501-2015.06.004]
[17]   What Is the Optimal Radiotherapy Target Size for Non-Operable Esophageal Cancer? A Meta-Analysis [J].
Zhu, Huiping ;
Pan, Wei ;
Chen, Yong ;
Chen, Hui ;
Zuo, Yun ;
Sun, Xinchen .
ONCOLOGY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2019, 42 (09) :470-479