A global conservation basic income to safeguard biodiversity

被引:13
作者
de Lange, Emiel [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sze, Jocelyne S. [4 ]
Allan, James [5 ,6 ]
Atkinson, Scott [6 ,7 ]
Booth, Hollie [2 ,8 ]
Fletcher, Robert [9 ]
Khanyari, Munib [2 ,10 ,11 ]
Saif, Omar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Geosci, Edinburgh, Scotland
[2] Univ Oxford, Interdisciplinary Ctr Conservat Sci, Dept Zool, Oxford, England
[3] Wildlife Conservat Soc Cambodia Program, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
[4] Univ Sheffield, Sch Biosci, Sheffield, England
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Inst Biodivers & Ecosyst Dynam IBED, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Queensland, Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci CBCS, St Lucia, Qld, Australia
[7] United Nations Dev Programme, New York, NY USA
[8] Biodivers Consultancy, Cambridge, England
[9] Wageningen Univ & Res, Sociol Dev & Change Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
[10] Nat Conservat Fdn, Mysore, India
[11] Univ Bristol, Sch Biol Sci, Bristol, England
基金
英国自然环境研究理事会;
关键词
UNCONDITIONAL CASH TRANSFERS;
D O I
10.1038/s41893-023-01115-7
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biodiversity conservation supporting a global sustainability transformation must be inclusive, equitable, just and embrace plural values. The conservation basic income (CBI), a proposed unconditional cash transfer to individuals residing in important conservation areas, is a potentially powerful mechanism for facilitating this radical shift in conservation. This analysis provides comprehensive projections for potential gross costs of global CBI using spatial analyses of three plausible future conservation scenarios. Gross costs vary widely, depending on the areas and populations included, from US$351 billion to US$6.73 trillion annually. A US$5.50 per day CBI in existing protected areas in low- and middle-income countries would cost US$478 billion annually. These costs are large compared with current government conservation spending (similar to US$133 billion in 2020) but represent a potentially sensible investment in safeguarding incalculable social and natural values and the estimated US$44 trillion in global economic production dependent on nature. Increasing the reach of biodiversity conservation requires addressing the material needs of individuals and communities in and around protected areas. This analysis provides a comprehensive global projection for a conservation basic income.
引用
收藏
页码:1016 / 1023
页数:8
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] Opportunity costs: Who really pays for conservation?
    Adams, Vanessa M.
    Pressey, Robert L.
    Naidoo, Robin
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2010, 143 (02) : 439 - 448
  • [2] Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty
    Adams, WM
    Aveling, R
    Brockington, D
    Dickson, B
    Elliott, J
    Hutton, J
    Roe, D
    Vira, B
    Wolmer, W
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5699) : 1146 - 1149
  • [3] THE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT OF POVERTY ALLEVIATION: EVIDENCE FROM MEXICO'S OPORTUNIDADES PROGRAM
    Alix-Garcia, Jennifer
    McIntosh, Craig
    Sims, Katharine R. E.
    Welch, Jarrod R.
    [J]. REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2013, 95 (02) : 417 - 435
  • [4] The minimum land area requiring conservation attention to safeguard biodiversity
    Allan, James R.
    Possingham, Hugh P.
    Atkinson, Scott C.
    Waldron, Anthony
    Di Marco, Moreno
    Butchart, Stuart H. M.
    Adams, Vanessa M.
    Kissling, W. Daniel
    Worsdell, Thomas
    Sandbrook, Chris
    Gibbon, Gwili
    Kumar, Kundan
    Mehta, Piyush
    Maron, Martine
    Williams, Brooke A.
    Jones, Kendall R.
    Wintle, Brendan A.
    Reside, April E.
    Watson, James E. M.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2022, 376 (6597) : 1094 - +
  • [5] Basic Income From an Ecological Perspective
    Andersson, Jan Otto
    [J]. BASIC INCOME STUDIES, 2009, 4 (02)
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2019, BIOD FIN EC BUS CAS
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2017, Basic Income
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2019, US MAN WORLD DAT PRO
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2022, DAC LIST ODA REC
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2021, 1 DRAFT POST 2020 GL