Attitude Disparity and Worrying Scenarios in Genetic Discrimination-Based on Questionnaires from China

被引:0
作者
Wang, Zhong [1 ,2 ]
Guo, Yujun [3 ]
Xu, Rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Guangzhou 510520, Peoples R China
[2] Guangdong Univ Technol, Key Lab Digital Econ & Data Governance, Guangzhou 510520, Peoples R China
[3] Wuhan Univ, LIESMARS, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
关键词
genetic discrimination; attitude disparity; genetic testing; worrying scenarios; genetic data application; LIFE-INSURANCE; ETHICAL-ISSUES; RISK; WORKPLACE; MEDICINE; DISEASE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3390/healthcare11020188
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: As genetic testing is increasingly used in non-medical fields, the judgment of people's potential conditions based on predictive genetic information inevitably causes genetic discrimination (henceforth GD). This article aimed to systematically investigate the disparity in attitudes and worrying scenarios concerning GD in China. Methods: A questionnaire survey of 555 respondents was conducted. Statistical tests were used to examine disparity in attitudes between gender, age, and education. A descriptive analysis was also conducted to explore other worrying scenarios. Results: It shows that (1) men are more tolerant of GD compared to women, and (2) participants aged between 18 and 30 years old possess the highest objection to GD. However, (3) no indication can attest to the relationship between educational level and perspective on GD. In addition, (4) the acceptance of gene testing in the three most common scenarios is ranked in descending order as follows: partner choice, insurance services, and recruitment. Moreover, (5) worrying scenarios relating to GD include: education, social occasions, medical services, fertility, shopping, and so on. Conclusions: Based on the results, suggestions proposed include developing a blacklist mechanism in the field of genetic data application and strengthening the security regulations for the commercial use of genetic data.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], WHAT IS PREC MED IN
  • [2] How is the trade-off between adverse selection and discrimination risk affected by genetic testing? Theory and experiment
    Bardey, David
    De Donder, Philippe
    Mantilla, Cesar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2019, 68
  • [3] Berryessa Colleen M, 2014, Recent Adv DNA Gene Seq, V8, P65
  • [4] BILLINGS PR, 1992, AM J HUM GENET, V50, P476
  • [5] Personalized cancer genetics training for personalized medicine: Improving community-based healthcare through a genetically literate workforce
    Blazer, Kathleen R.
    MacDonald, Deborah J.
    Culver, Julie O.
    Huizenga, Carin R.
    Morgan, Robert J.
    Uman, Gwen C.
    Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
    [J]. GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 13 (09) : 832 - 840
  • [6] Improving Service Delivery in a County Health Department WIC Clinic: An Application of Statistical Process Control Techniques
    Boe, Debra Thingstad
    Riley, William
    Parsons, Helen
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2009, 99 (09) : 1619 - 1625
  • [7] Brom M.E., 1991, DRAKE LAW REV, V40, P121
  • [8] Genomic medicine: Genetic testing
    Burke, W
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (23) : 1867 - 1875
  • [9] Return of Research-Related Genetic Test Results and Genetic Discrimination Concerns: Facilitators and Barriers of Genetic Research Participation in Diverse Groups
    Burnett-Hartman, Andrea N.
    Blum-Barnett, Erica
    Carroll, Nikki M.
    Madrid, Sarah D.
    Jonas, Cabell
    Janes, Kristen
    Alvarado, Monica
    Bedoy, Ruth
    Paolino, Valerie
    Aziz, Nazneen
    McGlynn, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2020, 23 (1-2) : 59 - 68
  • [10] CANTER EF, 1984, AM J LAW MED, V10, P323