Machine learning and the prediction of suicide in psychiatric populations: a systematic review

被引:11
|
作者
Pigoni, Alessandro [1 ,2 ]
Delvecchio, Giuseppe [2 ]
Turtulici, Nunzio [3 ]
Madonna, Domenico [2 ]
Pietrini, Pietro [4 ]
Cecchetti, Luca [1 ]
Brambilla, Paolo [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, Social & Affect Neurosci Grp, MoMiLab, Lucca, Italy
[2] Osped Maggiore Policlin, Fdn IRCCS CaGranda, Dept Neurosci & Mental Hlth, Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Milan, Dept Pathophysiol & Transplantat, Milan, Italy
[4] IMT Sch Adv Studies Lucca, MoMiLab, Lucca, Italy
关键词
MAJOR DEPRESSIVE DISORDER; RISK-FACTORS; SELF-HARM; DECISION-TREE; SUBSTANCE USE; IDENTIFICATION; SCHIZOPHRENIA; IDEATION; WOMEN; MODEL;
D O I
10.1038/s41398-024-02852-9
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Machine learning (ML) has emerged as a promising tool to enhance suicidal prediction. However, as many large-sample studies mixed psychiatric and non-psychiatric populations, a formal psychiatric diagnosis emerged as a strong predictor of suicidal risk, overshadowing more subtle risk factors specific to distinct populations. To overcome this limitation, we conducted a systematic review of ML studies evaluating suicidal behaviors exclusively in psychiatric clinical populations. A systematic literature search was performed from inception through November 17, 2022 on PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus following the PRISMA guidelines. Original research using ML techniques to assess the risk of suicide or predict suicide attempts in the psychiatric population were included. An assessment for bias risk was performed using the transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines. About 1032 studies were retrieved, and 81 satisfied the inclusion criteria and were included for qualitative synthesis. Clinical and demographic features were the most frequently employed and random forest, support vector machine, and convolutional neural network performed better in terms of accuracy than other algorithms when directly compared. Despite heterogeneity in procedures, most studies reported an accuracy of 70% or greater based on features such as previous attempts, severity of the disorder, and pharmacological treatments. Although the evidence reported is promising, ML algorithms for suicidal prediction still present limitations, including the lack of neurobiological and imaging data and the lack of external validation samples. Overcoming these issues may lead to the development of models to adopt in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to boost a field that holds the potential to critically impact suicide mortality.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Machine Learning Preprocessing Method for Suicide Prediction
    Iliou, Theodoros
    Konstantopoulou, Georgia
    Ntekouli, Mandani
    Lymberopoulos, Dimitrios
    Assimakopoulos, Konstantinos
    Galiatsatos, Dimitrios
    Anastassopoulos, George
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE APPLICATIONS AND INNOVATIONS, AIAI 2016, 2016, 475 : 53 - 60
  • [32] A systematic review on machine learning and deep learning techniques in cancer survival prediction
    Deepa, P.
    Gunavathi, C.
    PROGRESS IN BIOPHYSICS & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 2022, 174 : 62 - 71
  • [33] Machine Learning in the Diagnosis and Prognostic Prediction of Dental Caries: A Systematic Review
    Reyes, Lilian Toledo
    Knorst, Jessica Klockner
    Ortiz, Fernanda Ruffo
    Ardenghi, Thiago Machado
    CARIES RESEARCH, 2022, 56 (03) : 161 - 170
  • [34] MACHINE LEARNING IMPLEMENTATION IN LUNG CANCER PREDICTION - A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Oentoro, Janice
    Prahastya, Rafif
    Pratama, Rendy
    Meiliana
    Fajar, Muhamad
    2023 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION, ICAIIC, 2023, : 435 - 439
  • [35] PREDICTION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS PROGRESSION USING MACHINE LEARNING: A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW
    Castagno, Simone
    Gompels, Benjamin
    Strangmark, Estelle
    Robertson-Waters, Eve
    Birch, Mark
    van der Schaar, Mihaela
    McCaskie, Andrew
    OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2024, 32 : S68 - S69
  • [36] Cervical cancer survival prediction by machine learning algorithms: a systematic review
    Milad Rahimi
    Atieh Akbari
    Farkhondeh Asadi
    Hassan Emami
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [37] A systematic review for MOOC dropout prediction from the perspective of machine learning
    Chen, Jing
    Fang, Bei
    Zhang, Hao
    Xue, Xia
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 32 (05) : 1642 - 1655
  • [38] Machine learning methods in sport injury prediction and prevention: a systematic review
    Van Eetvelde, Hans
    Mendonca, Luciana D.
    Ley, Christophe
    Seil, Romain
    Tischer, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [39] Machine learning for phenotyping and risk prediction in cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review
    Banerjee, A.
    Chen, S.
    Fatemifar, G.
    Hemingway, H.
    Lumbers, T.
    Denaxas, S.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2019, 40 : 3574 - 3574
  • [40] The effect of machine learning algorithms in the prediction, and diagnosis of meningitis: A systematic review
    Ghaddaripouri, Kosar
    Ghaddaripouri, Maryam
    Mousavi, Atefeh Sadat
    Mousavi Baigi, Seyyedeh Fatemeh
    Rezaei Sarsari, Masoumeh
    Dahmardeh Kemmak, Fatemeh
    Mazaheri Habibi, Mohammad Reza
    HEALTH SCIENCE REPORTS, 2024, 7 (02)