Analysis of Cesarean Section Ratios by Robson Classification

被引:0
|
作者
Kinci, Mehmet Ferdi [6 ]
Kasap, Burcu [1 ]
Akin, Melike Nur [1 ]
Selimoglu, Berfin [2 ]
Tastan, Leyla [1 ]
Gokbel, Deniz Akin [1 ]
Gokbel, Ismail [3 ]
Sezgin, Burak [1 ]
Pirincci, Fatih [1 ]
Turkmen, Hilal Ezgi [1 ]
Sehirli, Ozge [4 ]
Gungorduk, Kemal [1 ]
Sivaslioglu, Ahmet Akin [5 ]
机构
[1] Mugla Sitki Kocman Univ, Educ & Res Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Mentese, Mugla, Turkiye
[2] Hilvan Sehit Halit Siltak State Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Hilvan, Sanliurfa, Turkiye
[3] Mentese State Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Mentese, Mugla, Turkiye
[4] Special Liv Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Cankaya, Ankara, Turkiye
[5] Izmir Ekonomi Univ, Med Point Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol Dept, Izmir, Turkiye
[6] Izmir Bayrakli City Hosp, Obstet & Gynecol, Izmir, Turkiye
关键词
Cesarean Section; Vaginal Birth; Robson 10-Group Classification System; INDUCTION; WOMEN; BIRTH; VBAC;
D O I
10.1007/s13224-023-01885-2
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background and AimCesarean section (CS) is a delivery method, which is used to avoid the complications of vaginal delivery, maternal and neonatal morbidity, and mortality. It has become the most applied surgical procedure both in Turkiye, and globally. In 2013, Robson et al. created the "Robson 10-Group Classification System" (TGCS) in Ireland to evaluate and standardize CS indications more easily.Materials and MethodsThe data for this retrospective study were collected from the records of women, who gave birth between January 1, 2019 and July 31, 2022 at Mugla University Education and Research Hospital. These data were classified according to the TGCS.ResultsThere were 4889 deliveries in our clinic between the specified dates. 3177 (64.98%) of these births were CS. When the CS ratio was evaluated as a percentage, the groups with the highest ratio were, respectively, Robson groups 9, 5, 7, and 8 (100%, 99.34%, 97.56%, and 96.92%). When the CS ratio was evaluated as a percentage, the group with the lowest ratio was Robson group 3 (21.5%). When numerically evaluated in terms of the effect on the CS number, the ranking was Robson groups 5, 1, and 2, respectively (1,053, 893, and 568).ConclusionThe CS ratio of our clinic is above the mean for that of Turkiye, and the highest acceptable CS ratio according to the WHO. Since our clinic is the only university hospital in the city, all complicated pregnancies are referred to our clinic, with births also taking place there. In addition, behavior change would be appropriate both with respect to active birth management and the action required to reduce the CS ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:434 / 439
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An analysis of the high cesarean section rates in Turkey by Robson classification
    Eyi, Elif Gul Yapar
    Mollamahmutoglu, Leyla
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2021, 34 (16) : 2682 - 2692
  • [2] Non-Clinical Variables Influencing Cesarean Section Rate According to Robson Classification
    Strambi, Noemi
    Sorbi, Flavia
    Bartolini, Gian Marco
    Forconi, Chiara
    Sisti, Giovanni
    Seravalli, Viola
    Di Tommaso, Mariarosaria
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2020, 56 (04):
  • [3] Cesarean section rates in Brazil Trend analysis using the Robson classification system
    Rudey, Edson Luciano
    Leal, Maria do Carmo
    Rego, Guilhermina
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (17) : E19880
  • [4] Gestational Risk as a Determining Factor for Cesarean Section according to the Robson Classification Groups
    Soares, Karina Biaggio
    Grolli Klein, Vanessa Cristina
    Reis Ferreira de Lima, Jose Antonio
    Gadenz, Lucas
    Paulo, Larissa Emile
    Konopka, Cristine Kolling
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2021, 43 (02): : 84 - 90
  • [5] Incidence of Preeclampsia and Cesarean Section Rate According to the Robson Classification
    Pasokpuckdee, Kritpol
    Boriboonhirunsarn, Dittakarn
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [6] Cesarean section trends in the Nordic Countries - a comparative analysis with the Robson classification
    Pyykonen, Aura
    Gissler, Mika
    Lokkegaard, Ellen
    Bergholt, Thomas
    Rasmussen, Steen C.
    Smarason, Alexander
    Bjarnadottir, Ragnheiour I.
    Masdottir, Birna B.
    Kallen, Karin
    Klungsoyr, Kari
    Albrechtsen, Susanne
    Skjeldestad, Finn E.
    Tapper, Anna-Maija
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2017, 96 (05) : 607 - 616
  • [7] Cesarean section and diabetes during pregnancy: An NSW population study using the Robson classification
    Zeki, Reem
    Oats, Jeremy J. N.
    Wang, Alex Y.
    Li, Zhuoyang
    Homer, Caroline S. E.
    Sullivan, Elizabeth A.
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2018, 44 (05) : 890 - 898
  • [8] Analysis of Cesarean Section Rates and its Indications Using Robson's Classification at a Tertiary Care Hospital, Manipur
    Janani, L.
    Christina, Soubam
    Akoijam, Brogen Singh
    Nameirakpam, Dipabali
    Laiphrakpam, Ranjit Singh
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 66 (04) : 434 - 438
  • [9] Use of Robson classification to assess cesarean section rate in Brazil: the role of source of payment for childbirth
    Nakamura-Pereira, Marcos
    Leal, Maria do Carmo
    Esteves-Pereira, Ana Paula
    Soares Madeira Domingues, Rosa Maria
    Torres, Jacqueline Alves
    Bastos Dias, Marcos Augusto
    Moreira, Maria Elisabeth
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2016, 13
  • [10] Cesarean Section Rate Analysis in a Tertiary Hospital in Portugal According to Robson Ten Group Classification System
    Vargas, Sara
    Rego, Susana
    Clode, Nuno
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GINECOLOGIA E OBSTETRICIA, 2020, 42 (06): : 310 - 315