Using Within-Person Change in Three Large Panel Studies to Estimate Personality Age Trajectories

被引:8
作者
Seifert, Ingo S. [1 ]
Rohrer, Julia M. [1 ]
Schmukle, Stefan C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leipzig, Wilhelm Wundt Inst Psychol, Neumarkt 9-19, D-04109 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
personality development; mean-level change; Big Five; panel studies; fixed effects modeling; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; RANK-ORDER STABILITY; OF-FIT INDEXES; BIG; 5; MEASUREMENT INVARIANCE; BETWEEN-PERSON; SOCIAL-INVESTMENT; MEAN-LEVEL; LIFE-SPAN; FACTORIAL INVARIANCE;
D O I
10.1037/pspp0000482
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
How does personality change when people get older? Numerous studies have investigated this question, overall supporting the idea of so-called personality maturation. However, heterogeneous findings have left open questions, such as whether maturation continues in old age and how large the effects are. We suggest that the heterogeneity is partly rooted in methodological issues. First, studies may have failed to recover age effects as they did not stringently separate within-person changes from confounding between-person differences. Second, items supposedly belonging to the same trait may show different individual trajectories, thus rendering results sensitive to the specific set of items used. We analyzed panel data from Australia (N = 15,268; Study 1), Germany (N = 22,833; Study 2), and the Netherlands (N = 10,163; Study 3) to investigate age trends in the Big Five on the levels of both scores and items. We applied a fixed effects approach that incorporates only within-person changes over time. Developmental trends in the Big Five scores were generally moderate to large and broadly confirmed personality maturation at younger ages. At older ages, maturation consistently continued for Neuroticism, whereas we found mixed evidence for such changes in Conscientiousness and Agreeableness. Furthermore, in each study, individual items showed age trends that diverged from the rest of the corresponding trait, and these differential patterns could be partly replicated across the three studies. Our results highlight the importance of items in the study of personality development and provide an explanation for previously unaccounted for variability in age trends.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 174
页数:25
相关论文
共 175 条
[81]  
Jorgensen Terrence D, 2022, CRAN
[82]   Core and Surface Characteristics for the Description and Theory of Personality Differences and Development [J].
Kandler, Christian ;
Zimmermann, Julia ;
McAdams, Dan P. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2014, 28 (03) :231-243
[83]   Editorial: Journal Article Reporting Standards [J].
Kazak, Anne E. .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2018, 73 (01) :1-2
[84]  
Kline R. B., 2016, PRINCIPLES PRACTICE
[85]   Sound Body, Sound Mind? The Interrelation Between Health Change and Personality Change in Old Age [J].
Kornadt, Anna E. ;
Hagemeyer, Birk ;
Neyer, Franz J. ;
Kandler, Christian .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2018, 32 (01) :30-45
[86]   The transition to grandparenthood: No consistent evidence for change in the Big Five personality traits and life satisfaction [J].
Kraemer, Michael D. ;
van Scheppingen, Manon A. ;
Chopik, William J. ;
Richter, David .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2023, 37 (05) :560-586
[87]  
Kratz F., 2021, PsyArXiv, DOI [10.31234/osf.io/d8f2z, DOI 10.31234/OSF.IO/D8F2Z]
[88]   Short assessment of the Big Five: robust across survey methods except telephone interviewing [J].
Lang, Frieder R. ;
John, Dennis ;
Luedtke, Oliver ;
Schupp, Jurgen ;
Wagner, Gert G. .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2011, 43 (02) :548-567
[89]  
Liebig Stefan, 2021, RDC SOEP, DOI 10.5684/soep.core.v36eu
[90]   Global Diversity of Authors, Editors, and Journal Ownership Across Subdisciplines of Psychology: Current State and Policy Implications [J].
Lin, Zhicheng ;
Li, Ningxi .
PERSPECTIVES ON PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 18 (02) :358-377